What happens when the pod cracks open, the peas come out, and find a thick layer of soil that’s rich in moisture and nutritious fertilizer?
To find out, we study what the legacy of the
two pioneers in Middle Eastern terrorism left behind that grew to become the
quintessence of a modern terrorist entity disguised as a state.
Like two legs, the Irgun and Hagenah Jewish
terror groups, grew to support the one and only terrorist entity that continues
to plague the human race today: the one which calls itself Israel. In addition,
the two legs have had sponsors equipped with human names and human faces. One
is called Menachem Begin, the other Yitzhak Shamir.
Menachem Begin was the leader of the Irgun
terror group that was itself a branch of the Hagenah organization. First, Menachem
Begin specialized in terrorizing and assassinating the British UN appointed
managers of Palestine. When he was done with that, he concentrated on
conducting the mass extermination of unarmed and helpless farmers of Palestine
whose lands and properties he stole and gave to Jewish settlers imported from
Eastern Europe, and later imported from the rest of the world. Menachem Begin
eventually became Prime Minister of terrorist Israel.
The other leg was Yitzhak
Shamir who began his terrorist career by joining the Irgun group, but then
split to go with the Lehi faction that gained notoriety for its extreme
savagery. Shamir invented the process of dividing a terror group into cells,
which proved to be an effective way to carry on with the business of terror
while risking only the possible detection of one cell, and not the group or the
entire organization. Yitzhak Shamir eventually became Prime Minister of terrorist
Israel.
Why is it important for us to recall these
historical events at this time? It is important because two Jews, Joseph I.
Lieberman and Mark D. Wallace, looked in the mirror of time, saw how the Israeli
entity came into being, and attributed the horrific ugliness that was revealed —
to the people and states in the Middle East, they want America to kill so that
Israel may collect the spoils. Liberman and Wallace put their thoughts in an
article that came under the title: “Iran and the Taliban: Rotten peas in a
pod,” published on September 19, 2021 in the New York Daily News.
Instead of interpreting what they see today
in light of what began to unfold a century ago, the two writers transposed the
horror that was generated by Jews, and documented by them as well as by others,
unto Iran and Afghanistan to tarnish their characters, and make Israel look more
legitimate than it ever was or can ever be. And because they feared that this may not be
enough to cause America to move militarily against Iran or Afghanistan,
Lieberman and Wallace pulled out and played the demagogic card of
scaremongering in the hope that this will nudge America. To that end, they
started their article this way:
“The
similarities between the Taliban of Afghanistan and the Islamic Republic of
Iran are striking and worth assessing before the US aids either in any way or
makes agreements with either that will affect our national security”.
Without explaining how a reconciliation that
may be forged between America and Iran, or America and Afghanistan, will
negatively affect the security of the United States, Lieberman and Wallace
unleashed a ferocious diatribe against the two Muslim nations. Reading the
thing, you could tell that every adjective and every adverb they used to characterize
Iran and Afghanistan were formulated in their heads not because they were
thinking about the Muslim nations, but because they were thinking about the
horrors that the Jewish Irgun and Hagenah committed in the past, and that
Israel continues to commit today. But true to form, the shameless Jewish
pundits attributed such characterizations to the Muslim nations.
For example, after falsely accusing Iran and
Afghanistan of being radical terrorist regimes, built around an extreme
interpretation of their religion, the two authors asked the question: How can
the US have any confidence in agreements that have been made or are
contemplated with either of these regimes? The writers wrote these words
despite the fact that even after America reneged on the deal it had worked with
Iran and four other powers, Iran continued to abide by the terms of the
agreement in the hope that America will be so honorable as to return to the
negotiating table, apologize for the mistake it made, and give assurance, that
America will never again commit such a treacherous act. But America did nothing
of the sort.
As to the nation “pursuing a system of
governance that is built around an extreme interpretation of their religion,”
these are words that apply to Israel more than anyone else. From the start, the
idea of Israel’s founders had been to build a nation that will be Jewish and so
maintained by any means, including the practice of crimes against humanity
known as ethnic cleansing.
And when America tried to rectify the problem
— it created when it moved its embassy to West Jerusalem — now announcing that
it intends to establish a consulate in East Jerusalem, the government of Israel
cried out: “Please don’t America. Don’t do it because this will cause the
religious zealots to topple the government and bring back the ultra-fanatic who
was kicked out not long ago”.
Nothing of the sort happened in Iran or
Afghanistan to suggest that they are “pursuing a system of governance that is
built around an extreme interpretation of their religion,” but Lieberman and
Wallace could not resist attributing this Jewish trait to the Muslims.
The article of the Jewish pair, Joseph
Lieberman and Mark Wallace goes on in such manner for several more paragraphs,
and you get the idea.
Now guess what the two Jewish writers have
recommended after they finished spewing their obligatory quota of lies and
deceptive interpretations. You guessed it, they recommended that America use
physical force against the Muslims.
These people truly are the perpetual self-destruction machine that’s made to order for America.