Americans are panicky about losing the ability to influence the world. Unlike the decade of the 1950s when they feared that Communism was about to establish itself in America, and turn it into a satellite of the Soviet Union, what the Americans fear now is that China will impose its autocratic system of governance on the developing world, thus diminish or eliminate America’s influence in those places.
Whereas
these inquiries sap a good part of America’s brainpower, preventing it from
paying attention to other matters, the rest of the world is nervous about
another trend they see unfolding on America’s politico-cultural scene. It is
the struggle that’s ongoing between the Jews who got used to the idea that
America is meant to become their exclusive plantation, and the nativists who
are prepared to use force to “retake” America from the Jewish usurpers whom
they believe, seek to replace them.
And
so, instead of delving into the analysis of what is shaping as a battle royale
between the nativists of America and the Jews, you’ll find that America’s
brainpower is deployed in situations that will yield no benefit for the
country. One such situation has come under the title: “Competing with China
Requires Engaging the Developing World,” an article that was written by Paul
Haenle and Sam Bresnick, and published on October 30, 2021 in The National
Interest.
You’ll also find that the article has a long
subtitle which happens to be both the deduction of the authors’ argument, and
the closing sentence at the end of the article. It reads as follows:
“Given the
United States’ status as the global leader, it would behoove Washington to
expand its engagement with the developing world to improve people’s quality of
life and prove that democratic societies can drive global development despite
increasing domestic and international challenges”.
Paul Haenle and Sam Bresnick go on to explain
why doing these things, is important for America and the world. Here, in
condensed form, is their view:
“Given the
administration’s focus on competition with China, this article highlights the
significant flaw in its early strategy. Souring relations with the West have
done little to disrupt Beijing’s strategy to become the unofficial leader of
the developing world. China has doubled down on diplomacy with developing
countries, dispatching a top diplomat on a tour throughout Southeast Asia, the
Middle East, Africa, and beyond. China has made strategic investments in
technology, infrastructure, and energy projects that few, if any, other
countries are willing or able to; Beijing is working with governments, on their
terms, to support their goals across a wide range of sectors”.
But all is not lost, say Paul Haenle and Sam
Bresnick. It’s because America has gradually changed its thinking when it comes
to dealing with its rivals. Whereas it used to depend on its might to deter or
defeat an opponent that dared to confront it, America now depends on the
strategy that the Judeo-Yiddish culture has infused into the American culture.
That is, America will sit back and wait for the opponent to make a mistake, at
which time it will move to hit it as hard as a superpower can. Like it or not, this
is the cowardly principle of hitting a man when he is down.
This is what you see expressed in the following
passage from the Haenle and Bresnick article:
“Many Western analysts have written that Beijing has lost its
confidence, is losing its influence, and has even begun flailing on the
international stage in the face of increasing international pressure. Such
negative appraisals of China’s behavior and trajectory are backed by revulsion
against Beijing’s diplomacy, human rights violations, and unwillingness to cooperate
on investigating the origins of the coronavirus, among other concerns …
Americans and Europeans now view Beijing more negatively than at any point
since1989”.
While this is helpful, say the two authors, it
is not enough to upstage China. They explain that America may score a few
successes, rallying to its side the traditional European and Asian allies, it
loses a great deal when it neglects to show up where the Chinese are going in
force. These would be places like Africa, the Middle East, Latin America and
Southeast Asia where America’s economic and development projects are lagging.
So,
we must ask: Why did it happen that America became oblivious of the obvious, and
lagged behind a competitor which, only two decades ago, was considered a Third
World country? The answer is that America was blinded to the reality that it was
undergoing at the macro level what the nativists of America are accusing the
Jews of doing at the micro level. That is, with the help of America’s Jews,
Israel is slowly but surely replacing America in Africa, the Middle East, Latin
America and Southeast Asia. Israel is doing it, using America’s wealth and good
name, doing or promising to do in those places what America is failing to do in
its name.
Look
around and you’ll see that hardly a month goes by without a congressional
delegation, made mostly of Jewish legislators and other officials, going to one
of those places under the aura of America’s power, prestige and official
auspices —
to pimp for Israel. American gifts disguised as Jewish aid, go with such visits,
making the recipients believe that it is not American, but Jewish and Israeli
charity.
What
this boils down to, is that the real competition is taking place between China
using Chinese resources, and Israel using American resources. Whichever of the
two wins, America loses.
Now make a guess: Which of the two, would you say Africa, the Middle East, Latin America and Southeast Asia will accept more readily and honor?