Near the end of the 1950s, and throughout the 1960s, the big debate—notwithstanding the Sputnik moment—was about the predicted collapse of the Soviet Union. The fear expressed by most everyone at the time, was that the military of that country will lash out at the world with an offensive that will start a nuclear war, thus end up destroying the Planet.
Well, it took a bit of time for the Soviet
Union to collapse, but it did not lash out at the world as predicted. On the
contrary, the Soviet leaders did the most civilized act you could imagine by
acknowledging that they operated with a bad system for seventy years. And so,
they humbly asked America—which had been their foe throughout the Cold War—to
help them pull their Federation out of the disorder in which it found itself,
and rebuild it to perform as well as America’s economic and political systems.
Fast forward to a time when America thoughtlessly
elected George W. Bush (43) to be its first “Jewish President,” as derisively
remarked by his own family. Regardless of what was said about him, Bush made it
so that the Jewish entourage he brought around him, was given a free hand to formulate
the doctrine he publicly stated as being to never allow any nation or a
combination of them to become as strong as America, let alone surpass it
militarily or economically.
This meant that America was going to adopt
the Israeli method of operation, which was to try destroying the scientific and
technological installations of its potential foes so as to prevent them from
modernizing their countries or advance their societies. But while Israel
counted on America to give it the most advanced weapons it has, while at the
same time doing what it could to deny Israel’s neighbors procuring weapons of
equal performance, who will America count on to help it when it’ll get into
trouble? The answer is that there is nobody around that can do for America what
America cannot do for itself.
Aside from that, when we compare the American
acts of destroying the installations of its rivals out of fear and desperation,
with the false predictions that were made about the Soviet Union lashing out at
the world as it dissolved, we see some similarities but also see a difference
that is disquieting. It is that the Soviet Union never stated such doctrine,
and had no one telling it what to do, certainly not the Jews. In contrast, America
has proven to be the trigger-happy doped soldier who is marching to the Jewish
drumbeat of war, war and still more war.
Between the years 2013 and 2020, the call of the
Jewish pundits had been an open incitement for America to dictate and impose
Israel’s terms on Iran with regard to the latter’s nuclear program, or bomb
that country into the Stone Age if it refused to comply. After seven years, the
Jews finally realized that they were whistling Dixie, and were turning the
American people against them as they endlessly repeated the call to war that no
one wanted to hear. And so, the Jews changed their tune. What they do now is
ask that America take the necessary measures to deter Iran. The big word these
days is “deterrence”.
That being the new called-for Jewish doctrine,
it has spilled over from the way to treat Iran, to the way that America is
advised to treat all its foes including the two military superpowers Russia and
China. You can see how this plays out in the article that came under the title:
“Putin barks, Biden blinks,” written by Tom Rogan, and published on November
23, 2021 in The Washington Examiner.
Here, in condensed form is what Tom Rogan had
to say about this matter:
“President Joe Biden has established a Russia
policy centered on appeasement. Pentagon press secretary John Kirby evinces as much,
saying that the directive is in keeping with our desire to see a
de-escalation of tensions in the region and help create space for a diplomatic
resolution. This is a truly delusional strategy. But especially misguided is
the timing of the decision to leak this directive. It comes a few days after
Putin warned that NATO air activities threatened to cross Russian red lines.
The strategy is exactly the wrong US message to send and the wrong time to send
it. The directive shows an absence of resolve. NATO has serious issues, but the
worst thing the US could do would be to back away from deterrence activity.
What if the Russians seize Ukraine, then masses forces against Poland,
Slovakia, Hungary, and Romania? These are hypothetical scenarios. Once again, deterrence
matters”.
Note that in keeping with the Jewish style of
using the loaded tropes of the 1930s, Tom Rogan started his discussion by
accusing Joe Biden of establishing a policy that’s centered on appeasement.
Yes, it is that word, “appeasement” which
invokes the image of Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain of Britain who returned
to his country after meeting with Hitler, and assured the British people that the
Munich Agreement which allowed Hitler to keep Czechoslovakia’s Sudetenland, was
going to guarantee that peace will reign in Europe.
Thus, Tom Rogan’s message is that to refrain
from deterring Russia and China at this time, risks engulfing Europe in
something like the event which resulted from Chamberlain’s policy of
appeasement. That would be a calamitous war.
The thing is that having seen how well the
Nazis were fighting, it was the entire British government, not just
Chamberlain, who knew that trying to deter Hitler would have been a useless undertaking.
They judged that he was going to call their bluff and proceed with his plans no
matter what.
So, this is the question for Tom Rogan and his fellow warmongers: What if America “deterred,” either Russia or China or both, and they called the bluff? Then what?