It took a Jewish terrorist from Eastern Europe, who goes by the name of Yitzhak Shamir, only a few moments to tell America to emasculate itself, and America began the process of doing just that.
Yitzhak Shamir travelled to America at some
point in the decade of the nineteen eighties. He went on national television,
and in his distinctly Eastern European Judeo-Yiddish accent, spoke to the
Zombies of the Washington Beltway. Speaking of the Arab and Muslim nations, he
told the zombies, “Zey know nossing about za damacracy of za Shamir.” And that
was enough for the zombies to grab the scalpel and reach out to Uncle Sam’s
organ of manhood. The rest is recorded in the history books for the future to
read and be astonished.
In fact, the history is to the effect that the
Americans were plagued with a complex of inferiority so intense, when they came
to decide how to behave on the international stage, they took the advice of
Britain’s Churchill and started the Cold War, took the advice of the French and
got into the Vietnam quagmire, and took the advice of the Jews, and lost their
manhood in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
As
odd as it may sound, America still suffers from the inability to decide what is
good for its people, or formulate a foreign policy that will achieve that end.
Thus, you find that the braindead elites who sit at the helm of the ship of
state are plugged, not into the network of the constituents that elect them,
but the echo chamber of the lobbies that serve the interests of foreign
countries. The three most powerful of these lobbies at this time, being the
Judeo-Israeli, the Cuban and the Taiwanese.
The
lobbies are made of people who want to see American power utilized to defend
the foreign country they represent, or attack and destroy the foreign country
they loathe and fear. Their work being in the purview of the military more than
any other field, you’ll find that they have an affinity with the American
military-industrial complex, if not a working relationship with it.
Known
collectively as hawks, sometimes even as warmongers, the lobbyists rely on a
bevy of pundits to keep hammering the right message for them, thus maintain the
braindead helmsmen focused on the reality that they are where they are to serve
the causes of foreigners, even if it means the permanent deployment of troops
abroad, and the engagement in war when necessary.
For
the message to sound legitimate—thus
survive as long as can be—the
pundits saw a great utility in the use of Yitzhak Shamir’s locution: “Zey know
nossing about za damacracy of za Shamir.” Stripped of its foreign accent, it
boils down to telling America the following: Use democracy as a weapon to
interfere in the affairs of other nations. Use whatever measures are necessary
to bend those nations to the wishes of the lobby groups that want to see the
system of governance loosened up.
You
can see an example of that in the article that came under the title: “Biden’s
Summit for Democracy Must Be More Than Aspirational,” and the subtitle: “The
Biden administration’s Summit for Democracy begins in December. Here are two
goals for the summit and three ways to achieve them.” It was written by Patrick
W. Quirk, and published on November 6, 2021 in The National Interest.
Here,
in condensed form, is how the preamble of Patrick Quirk’s article reads:
“The
Biden administration will hold a virtual Summit for Democracy. Now is the time
for the White House to focus on accomplishing its overall democracy agenda. The summit is a means to an end. Hopefully, the
National Security Strategy will include a strong component on democracy
promotion. The administration must define
what success looks like for its overseas democracy support. The president’s
team can establish intended summit outcomes in a manner that guarantees the
administration’s vision for success. There are two
ways to conceptualize what success looks like, and three ways to use the summit
to get there”.
As
can be seen, the message of the pundits to the Biden administration is
unmistakably the implementation of a democracy agenda. They are giving the
President two ways by which to conceptualize the success to be achieved, and
three ways to achieve it.
Here
are the two ways to conceptualize the success:
“The first mark of
success would be a halt to the current backsliding of democracies. The second
sign of progress would be the presence of the architecture and commitments
required to ensure that democracy is the predominant form of governance
globally well into the future”.
And
here are the three ways to achieve the desired success:
“First, the summit
should result in formalizing a grouping that has the cohesion and mandate to
protect and advance democracy within and outside members’ borders. Second, the
summit should result in a commitment from the United States and allies to
support a new international norm—the ‘Right to Assist’ pro-democracy
movements—and identify steps to advance and implement it. Third, the United
States and its allies should announce a tripling of their financial support for
strengthening democracy overseas”.
Can
you guess where the “Right to Assist” came from? Does the “Responsibility to
Protect” ring the bell? That was the cockamamie doctrine under which America
interfered in the affairs of other countries, causing horrific damage to them
and to the world.
Conscious
of these failures, and shy about telling America to repeat the experience, the
warmongers are suggesting a milder sounding doctrine for now, in the hope that
mission-creep will eventually get America into a full-blown Forever War.
They never abandon their gory dream.