Michael Makovsky has devised a new approach, a kind of test
by which to judge the right of a regime to be left alone as it governs the
population it presides over the way it sees fit. He applied the test to the Iranian
regime in Tehran ,
and has found it wanting. And yet, the Obama Administration is tolerating this
regime, says Makovsky.
He wrote his opinion in an article that came under the
title: “Iranian Cheating” and had it published in the Weekly Standard on
October 16, 2015. His lament against President Obama is this: “The conclusion
the administration draws is frightening. Iranian cheating in one area, we are
to believe, should not be taken to mean that Iran will cheat elsewhere, too.
Cheating is not, we are to believe, a general characteristic of a regime with
nothing but contempt for the international legal institutions.”
The Jewish tendency being that these people would mutilate
any concept – ranging from a historical event to a legal, philosophical or logical
one – Makovsky came up with that test to mutilate the meaning of an event
that's of little importance to humanity but a huge one to Israel and to the
Jewish Establishment. It is the Iranian launch of a new missile about which
Makovsky says: “Legally, this launch was an indisputable violation of Security
Council Resolution 1929.”
Despite the fact that no one in the world sounded the alarm
about that launch, and that America 's
own UN ambassador said only this: “if the facts are as we believe them to be,
it would violate Security Council resolutions,” Makovsky has concluded that the
test was an indisputable violation. He then used his own conclusion to argue
that because he accused the Iranians of cheating on the missile resolution
(passed by the Security Council without their consent) they will also cheat on
the nuclear deal, an agreement to which they consented. That's layers of false
accusations wrapped in delusional speculation.
It is also pure Jewish masturbation of the intellect, a
trick by which people like Makovsky mutilate everything they can get their
hands on to serve their current need. He did it despite the assurances that
were given by White House press secretary Josh Earnest who said: “we've seen
that Iran
over the last couple of years has demonstrated a track record of abiding by the
commitments they made in the context of the nuclear talks.”
And the Makovsky masturbation continues: “The fact is that
the larger implications of the missile launch are staring us in the face.
Indeed, what is most stunning about Earnest's statement is not the contention
that Iran hasn't cheated but
the implicit claim that … Iran
could build and fire as many missiles as it wanted.” Look what this Jew is
saying. He is saying: never mind that the Iranians proved to be honest, that's
not my problem with them. My problem is that they are so advanced, they can
build and fire any number of missiles they want.
Now that he falsely accused the Iranians of violating
international agreements, and having convinced himself that he got away with
it, he sets out to pave the way for violating the nuclear agreement negotiated
with Iran by the P5+1 group of nations on behalf of the international
community. Look how he does that: “Ballistic missiles are not some minor
offshoot of a nuclear program … Thanks to the administration's delusion, in
believing these matters are 'entirely separate,' Iran will be permitted to
attain the capability to fire nuclear weapons at the American homeland.”
Translation: the nuclear deal is bad and must be scrapped or reinterpreted.
What he is doing here is Jewish style demagoguery. That is,
in the way that the Jewish leaders maintain control over the rank and file by
scaring ordinary Jews, Makovsky, who is a self-appointed Jewish leader, is
trying to establish control over the mentally deficient American legislators
who will believe that Iran
is preparing to attack America
with nuclear weapons. He tells them the following: “the ballistic missile
launch confirms that the deal has emboldened the Islamic Republic. This was
predictable to anyone that sees the world as it is instead of through a
delusional ideological prism.”
And he teases their brains nudging them to act: “We have a
Congress that is entitled to try to make the world less dangerous. Does the
nuclear deal require Congress to do nothing as Iran tests its missiles?”