The colonial powers of the past – most notably the British
and the French – were successful at what they did because they accomplished
several objectives simultaneously in the lands they occupied.
They wanted the natural resources of the colonies, and they
got them. They wanted to maintain the local population in a permanent state of
impotence lest it revolt, and they achieved this goal by employing several
schemes. They also wanted to organize the societies they colonized in a way
that would serve their military needs, and they did that too.
Still, colonialism as an institution began to lose its
appeal after the Second World War. There were a few holdouts in Africa, but
they too were vanquished in Algeria ,
Zimbabwe and South Africa ;
societies that were liberated by the struggle of their people to start the long
journey of becoming regular nations. Amid all this, however, something odd
happened; a new colonial power arose in the Middle East .
It took over Palestine , called itself Israel and
became a base inside of which schemes to colonize other lands were hatched.
The Israelis convinced the British and the French to go
after Egypt and retake the
vital resource that is the Suez Canal , but the
Americans ordered them out of there, and they got out. Seeing that the center
of power had shifted to the new world, the Israelis and their Jewish allies
reworked their schemes to prioritize the conquest of America . They managed to start the
process by asking the Americans to take many of the Jewish refugees that were
leaving the other places, and to help Israel absorb those that had
nowhere else to go.
Fast forward to the decade of the Seventies, and you see
that a remarkable convergence had taken place between the schemes that the
Israelis were implementing in occupied Palestine, and those that the Jews of
America were implementing in their adopted country – an America that was now
treated, not as a cherished motherland, but a recently acquired colony.
You'll get a sense of that parallel when looking at the
article that was written by Clifford D. May under the title: “Jobless and
desperate Palestinians” and the subtitle: “The boycott, divest and sanction
campaign will produce more of them.” It was published on October 27, 2015 in
The Washington Times.
The common thread tying the Palestinian and American
situations is a lesson to the effect that societies which are kept as colonies
can be controlled by manipulating the employment opportunities of its people.
You'll see how this is done in Palestine ,
which is the story of the Israeli businessman, Daniel Birnbaum that Clifford
May is profiling in his article.
While the specifics of that story are out in the open for
all to see, their parallels in America
are a lot more subtle, and harder to decipher. To understand what the Jews are
doing in America ,
we must first paint a picture of what their aim has always been. What the Jews
have wanted and still do, is to get America
to conquer the Middle East and a number of
other places because they know that when this is done, they will have effective
control of all these places.
For this to succeed, America will need a large ground
force that can occupy those lands for a long period of time. However, there is
no way that America
can have this size of an army without re-instituting the draft. But if this is
done, a repetition of the protests that erupted during the Vietnam era will force Washington to curtail its military
adventures overseas. And this is a problem that begs for a solution. What to
do?
The solution that's envisaged by the Jews is to have a large
army of volunteers. It will be made essentially of uneducated, unemployable
young men and women who will acquire financial security by joining the military
– an idea that was hinted at inadvertently in some Pentagon commercials, and
alluded to by a Joe Biden 'gaffe' moment. The way for the Jews to implement
this plan, is to cut on social spending, and use the freed money to produce the
weapons that the expanded military will need to deploy overseas.