Tuesday, October 6, 2015

The Mutilators of History are out in Force

Every Jew and his Evangelical running, barking dogs are out in force telling the history of the Middle East in a way that suits the thesis they happen to be developing at the moment they write it. The same is true with John Bolton who wrote: “Putin Unleashed,” an article that also came under the subtitle: “Russia's move for dominance in the Middle East.” It was published on October 4, 2015 in the Weekly Standard.

The event about which most of these people take liberty mutilating the historical record is the departure of Soviet advisers from Egypt in the year 1973. The truth is that following the invasion of the Canal Zone in 1956 by the colonial powers of Britain and France, an event in which Israel was invited to participate and learn how to do these things, the relation of Egypt with Europe changed drastically.

Because the Republican President of America, Dwight Eisenhower, who is credited for saving the Europeans from the madness of the Second World War a decade earlier, stood with Egypt and ordered Anthony Eden of Britain and Guy Mollet of France to end their lunacy and get out of Egypt, there was hope that a meaningful strategic relationship could be forged between that country and America. Alas, no one had taken into account the power of the Jews to act like the dogs they were created to be, and whisper slanderous lies in the ears of those who mistook them for human beings.

And what the Jewish dogs did in America is whisper in the ears of John Foster Dulles's State Department officials that Egypt's quest to build a dam and a hydroelectric station at Aswan would threaten America's interests in the region. When the Americans swallowed that poison, the Jews went further and explained that Israel could be transformed into a forward base for America's operations in the region if America blocked Egypt's quest to build the project, and began to prop up Israel's finances and military. And the Americans did just that.

Overnight, the burgeoning strategic relation between Egypt and America turned sour, and Egypt was left with no choice but to turn to the Eastern bloc for assistance in building the Aswan project and the other economic concerns. To make certain that the country was not joining an alliance with someone against another, Nasser of Egypt joined with Nehru of India and Tito of Yugoslavia to form the Non Aligned Movement whose motto was: We shall befriend those who befriend us, and oppose those who oppose us.

But while the Egyptians were busy modernizing their economy, the Jews were preparing to embark on a long term plan to drag America into the Middle Eastern quagmire they were creating by attacking the countries of the region at the moment they least expected it. And they got America's highly placed officials to come out and publicly state the wrong things, thus make it sound like America was one hundred percent behind Israel's aggressive designs on its neighbors.

And what the Jews were preparing was Israel's 1967 Pearl Harbor style sneak attack on the Sinai. Its purpose was to close the Suez Canal and deprive Egypt of its revenues thus slow down the country's economic progress. When this happened, the Egyptians realized that having a Jewish concoction at your border requires you to have a military that can defend your achievements. And so they embarked on a program to modernize their military with training and with new equipment.

Unable to get what they needed from Europe or America, the Egyptians turned to the Soviets. They got what they needed in terms of equipment and the personnel to train them. When, in 1973, they felt ready to cross the Canal, liberate the Sinai and reopen the waterway, President Sadat who succeeded Nasser, told the Russians to leave Egypt because he wanted to make sure that no one will come to believe the Russians were participating in the battles to come. And the Russians agreed it was a good idea. They left Egypt; Sadat's army crossed the Canal, retook the Sinai and reopened the waterway – a happy ending that has been the hallmark of Egyptian history since the beginning of time.

Look now how Bolton tells that history: “The Kremlin is meddling in ways unprecedented since Sadat expelled Soviet advisers in the 1970s … and ultimately enabled the Camp David accords with Israel.” This is not a flagrant falsehood, but the choice of words such as “meddling, unprecedented and expelled” in addition to the idea that the Russian exit from Egypt enabled the Camp David Accords, are preposterous notions historically speaking.

Aside from that, what is truly a flagrant mutilation of history is someone I heard the other day while surfing the television channels. He said that Henry Kissinger expelled the Russians from Egypt. There is only one thing to say about that character and all characters like him. These people are not political animals or history animals ... they are animals; period. They should be whipped and made to pull carriages at Central park or something, not allowed to pontificate on television.

As to John Bolton, the very fact that he cannot write history without making it a self-serving proposition, renders his writing null and void as well as useless.