The Judeo-Israeli self-appointed and self-promoting
protection racket serving the half-baked intellectuals of the Jewish Diaspora
is imploding. And so, its members are trying to hang on to life by reviving the
tricks that brought the racket into existence in the first place. The tricks
being: (1) Accusing those who refuse to toe their line of being anti-Semitic.
(2) Connecting fictitious dots linking them with something terrible – such as
terrorism, for example.
After reaching the zenith of its glory a decade ago, the
racket began to lose its luster right after the grand wizard of the fraudulent
enterprise, Alan Dershowitz, had managed to score a major victory. It was in
fact a coup that even his loyal disciples judged it to be repugnant both in
conception and in execution. It is that Dershowitz had convinced a major
American university to deny tenure to a Jewish professor, a child of Holocaust survivors
that refused to toe the racket's line.
By that time, the Dershowitz crusade was making impressive
headway and coming dangerously close to changing the image of the American
university from being the symbol of free inquiry to that of an assembly of
pimps and prostitutes, madams and gigolos modeled after the image of the
Federal and State legislatures.
That was then but things are beginning to change. The
situation now looks a bit different in the sense that the universities are no
longer the bastions that used to accept as legitimate every Jewish and Israeli
demand however capricious it may have been. To their credit, the universities
changed to a neutral position the moment they realized it was a mistake to buy
the Jewish line that used to say the coin of the Middle
East has two sides: The Jewish side as told by the Jews, and the
Arab side as told by the Jews.
Now the Arabs – mostly Palestinians – are telling their side
of the story, and this was enough to cause the volcanic eruption of hate, fear
and envy in the belly of the Jewish leaders. You see this phenomenon in the
behavior of the racketeers and their buddies who attack the Arab students that
dare to speak for themselves. Not only that, but the racketeers also attack the
Jewish students who consider the Arab message to be legitimate, honest and
commanding respect.
There is plenty to look at when studying that situation, the
latest being “Hidden anti-Semitism in Students for Justice in Palestine 's deceit,” an editorial that was
published on May 1, 2016 in the New York Daily News. It contains a great deal
of similarities with the column that was published by Bret Stephens of the Wall
Street Journal on April 26, 2016 under the title: “The Anti-Israel Money
Trail,” and was responded to on this website in an article that came under the
title: “Bret Stephens' great Service to Humanity”.
The Daily News shows how the racketeers pull other parties
into the fray and begin the process of decaying the fabric of the American
system. Here is an example: “the Zionist Organization accused the Students for
Justice in Palestine (SJP) of creating anti-Semitism on some campuses, and
sparking calls in the state Legislature to boot SJP from campuses.” In America , the Jews speak of booting some people
in the same way that in North
Korea the dictators speak of purging people.
It is also what Alan Dershowitz started doing; the reason why he was himself
purged from the company of respected people.
You may want to read his article of sobs. It came under the
title: “Safe spaces for hypocrisy,” a piece that was published on November 22, 2015
in the New York Daily News, and responded to in an article that came under the
title: “Jack the Ripper of the academic Free Speech,” published on this
website.
A notable similarity between the Daily News editorial and
the Stephens column is that both advocate a measure that's as deadly as
arsenic. Here is how the Daily News formulated it: “An analysis by the
Foundation for the Defense of Democracies has traced SJP's support to
Palestinian leaders who have had ties to Hamas.” And here is the Stephens version:
“FDD had seen no evidence of illicit activity … Still, it's worth thinking
about who these people are and the politics they support”.