Anne Bayefsky is at it again saying that Jews and Americans
are such perfect human beings, they must not be caught sitting in the same room
with the other two-legged creatures who believe they are human enough to belong
to a United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC).
She says that the Jews made George W. Bush understand this
truth so well, he resigned from the UNHRC because it was accepting some of the
two-legged creatures, but that Barack Obama refused to admit to that truth,
thus made America rejoin the Council, if only for him to “rule from the grave”.
If Bayefsky could have it her way, she would build a United
Nations that's made of two chambers. There will be an upper chamber where
Jewish rulers, Jewish financial experts and Jewish Joint Chiefs of the American
military will sit, and issue directives. And there will be a lower chamber
where the huddled inferior masses from every place on the planet will sit, and
wait for the upper chamber's directives to tell them what to do next.
This is the message that comes out of Bayefsky's latest
article, written under the title: “Look Who Will Be Joining the U.N. Human
Rights Council,” and the subtitle: “The Democratic Republic of the Congo and
Angola will join either Afghanistan or Qatar on a body that already features
paragons such as Saudi Arabia and Venezuela.” It was published on September 7,
2017 in The Weekly Standard.
Anne Bayefsky begins with the complaint that the “U.N. Human
Rights Council has an election coming up in October.” She makes it clear she
does not like elections where hordes of inferior things get to decide how to
conduct their own lives and how to interact with each other. Her preference is
to have something like the self appointed so-called “Freedom House,” where
superior beasts of her ilk spend their time ranking nations into categories
that range from the lowest to the highest in terms of human rights protection.
In case you missed this superior form of Jewish logic, my
friend, let me make the effort to explain it to you, though I do not guarantee
I'll explain it well or that you'll understand it. Bayefsky means to say that
because these characters call themselves “Freedom” House, they represent
freedom. Because free and democratic can be used interchangeably, Freedom House
also means Democratic House. And so, when members of Democratic House appoint
themselves, they define Democracy as being self-appointment. Because election
is the opposite of self-appointment, it stands to Jewish reason that the
election, which is coming up in October at the United Nations, will be an
exercise in autocracy. Get it?
Now that Bayefsky has established self-appointment as being
the highest form of democracy, and election as being the lowest form of
non-democracy, she goes on to say that the best way to establish norms of human
rights is not for the nations that admit they have shortcomings to come
together and pledge to do better. No, no, no, she says. The best two ways to
establish human rights norms are (1) for the nation whose police shoot unarmed
citizens in the back as they flee, and then get acquitted in a so-called court
of law – to dictate such norms; and (2) for thugs who make a mess of their
lives anywhere in the world, and get paid by gambling moguls to go to
Palestine, kill people that have lived on the land since the beginning of time
and take their possessions – to participate in dictating such norms. Do you see
how Jewish clarity works? It couldn't be any clearer than that.
Anne Bayefsky also makes it clear she is unhappy about “The
U.N. system being rigged to allow human rights abusers to sit in judgment about
what counts as human rights abuse.” This means one of two things: either she
wants the abusers to recognize what they are, and recuse themselves from
sitting on the UNHRC; or she wants someone from the thing calling itself
Freedom House to dictate Judeo-democratically who can sit on the Council, and
who must be kept out.
What is also apparent from her piece is that she believes
and she cannot stomach that countries populated by unequal humans lie, feign
interest in human rights protection, and seek to legitimize their regimes by
belonging to the UNHRC. She is also baffled at the fact that “the United States
is willing to sit side-by-side with these countries as equals,” and serve as
their legitimizer.