Ever since they came into being as a “nation” seven decades
ago in occupied Palestine, the Jews that made a mess of their lives in Europe
and everywhere they went, made a mess of their lives in Palestine as well; the
place where they established their so-called Jewish homeland and called it
Israel.
Not only did they mess up Palestine
itself, so they did the entire neighborhood; a Middle East
that existed as the proverbial Garden of Eden since time immemorial, and they
managed to turn into a Jewish hellhole.
Plagued with the two vices that condemned King Sisyphus to
an eternity of useless Sisyphean effort that never achieves the desired goal;
the Jews of Israel continue to bask in the mistaken belief that they are God's
gift to humanity. And so, they endlessly try to prove the truthfulness of this
asinine fantasy by being the most devious charlatans ever to disgrace Planet
Earth. King Sisyphus, come to meet your match!
You get a sense of all that when you read the article that
was written under the title: “Iran Is Taking Over Syria. Can Anyone Stop It?”
It was authored by David W. Lesch and published on August 29, 2017 in the New
York Times. It describes a mounting Jewish effort to achieve an unattainable
goal that is bound to fail again, thus set the stage for a confrontation that
will cause more misery of the kind that the Jews have been inflicting on the
region since their advent into it.
After describing how politically agile President Hafez
al-Assad of Syria was, a
trait that his son President Bashar al-Assad has inherited, David Lesch laments
that this condition will no longer prevail because of what happened in the
region, most notably in Syria .
He describes the approach of the Assads as being “a uniquely flexible
geopolitical position,” one in which Syria did not take a rigid position
on any issue. But now, says the author, “Iran
has deeply penetrated Syria
in a way that Mr. Assad cannot ignore” thus, Assad will no longer be in a
position to pursue a flexible course.
When you follow the developments that brought the region to
its current state, you find that Israel (using the great powers of the time:
Joseph Stalin's Russia, Guy Mollet's France, Anthony Eden's Britain, and the
successive American Congresses since 1948) has been trying to shape the Middle
East to suit its long term agenda. It did so in the manner that King Sisyphus
was condemned to roll the boulder up the hill, only to see it fall back each
time that he came close to the top. Likewise, the Jews never closed the deal,
as the saying goes.
To add insult to injury, the result of those efforts has
never been a return to the original condition. What happened instead is that
the events took an unexpected turn each and every time. This time, for example,
Iran was dragged into the
mix, and that's what worries Israel
no end according to David Lesch. Here is how he expressed that sentiment: “If
Assad ends up as a client of Tehran ,
it could make for a very dangerous situation. Israel
is worried by that prospect … Israel
will feel that when it looks across the Golan Heights, it sees Iran staring
back.” Well, if not Iran ,
someone will be there staring back. Would Syrian soldiers or Hezbollah
combatants or al-Qaeda fighters be less scary?
What the Jews of Israel and their cohorts in America do not
seem to understand, is that events flow naturally, starting from an initial
condition. You can interrupt the flow and change its course if you try, but as
soon as you stop interrupting, the flow will take an independent course again.
If your plan is to take the events to a predetermined destination, you'll have
to dig a channel from where you stand to where you want the flow to go, and
force it to run inside the channel.
In other words, if the Jews wish to maintain control of the
situation at all time, they must establish a Nazi-style rule, such as the one
that failed in Europe; or a Zionist-style rule such as the one that's failing
in the West Bank .
The bad news for these guys is that no great power will
participate in a scheme like this ever again. The United
States may send a couple thousand or so trainers to a
distant country for a short period of time, but will never again repeat the
mistake of Vietnam or Afghanistan or Iraq .