Wednesday, April 4, 2018

Monkey rides Jackass to the House of Ignorance

Looking from a thousand feet up, it seems like a cowboy is riding a horse, going toward the house on the hill straight ahead. But when you swoop down and get close to the action, you see a monkey riding a jackass, going to the house of ignorance. What the hell is that about?

It's about a piece of writing that the editors of the New York Times have decorated with mascara and lipstick thinking it will be acceptable to a moderate audience. The trouble is that the editors made two big mistakes. To pile up on the metaphors, it can be said that the story turned out to be that of know-nothing amateurs mistaking acid-based coloring material for cosmetics. Using it, they created a monster fit for next Fall's Halloween whereas the intent was to beautify Cinderella and prepare her for the opening of next Spring's festival.

Those who are familiar with Middle Eastern issues will form mental images of that sort when they read the editorial that came under the title: “Israel Courts Catastrophe in Gaza Protests,” published on April 3, 2018 in the New York Times. The first mistake the editors made came early. It is this: “For more than a decade, Gaza has been blockaded by Israel and Egypt.” The second mistake came near the end of the piece when the editors turned a humanitarian catastrophe into a tool they deployed to blame the victims. And that's how they neutralized the little criticism they seemed to level against Israel's leaders.

Aside from all that, what took the editors down to the level of jackasses is that they did not stop and think what it means to say that Egypt – like Israel – is blockading Gaza. Before making a statement of this gravity, a human being would have defined the word “blockade.” He would have tested it against what Israel is doing and why; and he would have tested it against what Egypt is doing and why. He would also have tried to establish both the legality and morality of what each side was doing. Only then, would he pronounce himself as to whether or not there was equivalence between the two. But the editors of the New York Times did none of that. Instead, they equated the two using the conjunction “and,” thus made it sound like the blockade of Gaza was a joint venture mounted by Egypt and Israel.

The reality, however, is that Israel implemented an air, land and sea blockade around Gaza, preventing most everything from going in or out of that place of misery. The first thing it did after it was kicked out of Gaza was to use American bombs, rockets and warplanes to turn the Gaza airport into a pile of rubble. The next thing Israel did was to launch savage air assaults on Gaza's vital infrastructures such as water, power generation and sanitary installations. In addition, Israel boarded civilian ships headed toward Gaza; and on one occasion killed Turkish relief workers who were taking food and medicine to people that needed them badly.

By contrast, what Egypt does is protect its border with Gaza no differently from how it protects its borders with Libya, Sudan and Israel. What the animals of Israel have been doing for decades, however, was to shell, bomb and machine-gun the Gaza population to force it to flee into Egypt's Sinai. The aim of these animals is to establish in the mind of their counterparts in the American Congress the notion that Gazans should move into the Sinai and leave Gaza for Israel to annex. It is another of their long term projects aimed at establishing yet another fait accompli. It is the Jewish beastly way of riding on the back of the Jackasses, and lead them to the house of ignorance. That's where they meet the likes of the New York Times editors; the place where they all gather to blather in each others' ears the lie that Egypt – like Israel – is blockading Gaza.

As to the second mistake committed by the editors of the New York Times, it begins with their braying a high pitched hysterical shriek that sounds like this: “Palestinian leaders have also failed their people.” It is obvious that nobody told these brainless jackasses that when you've lived an act of war inflicted on your people for half a century, your priorities look different from those of others. This is true even if the others are the very people whose taxes are used to encourage, arm and finance the savages who are committed to exterminate your people and rob them of the spoils they leave behind.

No, Hamas has not started the ongoing war with Israel; it was America that armed the Jews and sent them to wage war against the Palestinians. If the differences between Hamas and the Palestinian Authority––brought about by Palestine’s unlucky situation––make them look bad, then the differences between the Left and the Right––which exist despite America’s good luck––make them look odious. To expect impeccable correctness from a people under occupation for half a century, is to show mental deficiency of the most Jewish kind.

And if there is one thing the editors of the New York Times should take away from this lesson; it’s that their house is made of glass, and they must not throw stones at others.