Saturday, April 28, 2018

The eternal Problem of incorrigible Recidivism

Dozens of articles are written every year by Jews who display the latest statistics concerning the number and kind of incidents that relate to what they call antisemitism in the world.

These days, the authors categorize such incidents and discuss them without openly suggesting a solution for the problem. Or if they do; it would be to suggest a new variation on an old solution; one that was tried on previous occasions and shown to increase incidents of antisemitism rather than diminish them.

This year is no different, and of the dozens of articles that have already been published on the subject, two are discussed below, having appeared on the same day, April 27, 2018, each in a different publication.

One article came under the title: “Ironic Consequences of Europe's War Guilt” and the subtitle: “In an attempt to atone for past wrongs, Europe invites a resurgence of anti-Semitism,” written by Mona Charen and published in National Review Online. She discusses antisemitism in Europe in general terms, but more specifically in Germany and France. The second article came under the title: “Jeremy Corbyn's Jewish problem,” written by Dominic Green and published in the Weekly Standard. He discusses antisemitism in Britain.

Whereas the method of Jewish writers in the old days was to mention the statistics and then indicate the kind of solution they wanted to see implemented in the quest to solve the problem of antisemitism, they choose to be a lot more subtle nowadays. What they fail to do, however, is step outside the traditional box containing the solutions that proved not to work. Here is how Mona Charen walked that tightrope:

“The response among European leaders has varied. Some avoid the question or retreat to platitudes. Some police forces are reluctant to label attacks as 'hate crimes.' Jeremy Corbyn is comfortable with left-wing anti-Semitism, which tends to bleed into every other kind”.

That is in contrast to the old days when she would have demanded that European leaders be clear and definitive about condemning acts of antisemitism. She would also have demanded they pass new laws that favor the Jews. And she would have demanded that the police double and triple the effort to catch and severely punish the perpetrators of such acts. As to the situation in Britain, she would have accused Jeremy Corbyn of inciting and encouraging all acts of antisemitism happening in Britain because he repeatedly fails to display discomfort when acts of antisemitism are committed in his country.

And that's not all because Charen goes on to point to a solution that is truly astounding. Here are her words: “How can it be that only 70 years after the Holocaust, Europe's Jews do not feel safe? It's ironic, but one reason is guilt. Eager to live down their histories of colonialism and racism, Europe has welcomed millions of immigrants from the Third World.” Though she does not say it openly, Mona Charen's point is that Europe must close the door to immigration from the Third World so as to protect the Jews.

But the real irony is not that Europe is taking in immigrants from where they come; it is that in making the suggestion – however subtle it may be – Mona Charen will discourage politicians that may have a good reason to want curbing immigration from discussing their point of view openly lest they be accused of wanting to implement the Jewish agenda.

As to the Dominic Green article, here is what the author says is happening in Britain: “The Labour Party does not have an anti-Semitism problem. It has two anti-Semitism problems.” He goes on to list those problems as follows: Corbyn is too friendly with Islamists as well as the Labour members and local councilors who popularize anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. And that's not to forget the 'white problem' which, Green says, refers to the Labour Party's inquiry about itself in which it whitewashed the self of the anti-Semitism accusation.

Well then, what does all that mean? Looking at the content of these two articles, and the dozens of similar articles, we cannot help but acknowledge that scarcely 70 years after the Holocaust during which time the Jews were pampered by humanity, the latter has turned against the Jews. Why? Who's at fault?

You can look at those questions anyway you want; the answer to them always boils down to this: Either humanity is at fault and must change, or the Jews are at fault and must change. Well, it is clear by now that the Jewish attempts to change humanity have boomeranged. Instead of changing to embrace the ways of the Jews, humanity has rejected those ways, and has developed resentment toward the Jews for trying to impose them on the population.

But wait a minute. Have the Jews not changed over the thousands of years when they roamed the earth from one place to another? Yes they have, but the problem is that they did not change the essence of what humanity resents about them. What they did is blend the supremacist attitude that humanity is rejecting, with the local culture everywhere they went, making their attitude more palatable for the locals. Initially, the Jews scored success but the people soon discovered what the Jews were up to and turned against them.

And that's what Mona Charen and Dominic Green say is happening in Europe. So the question is this: What's the solution? The answer is that the Jews must discard the core of their system of beliefs which is that they are the chosen children of God, and must be given exclusive privileges.

But if the Jews change that system of beliefs, Judaism itself will change and become something else. Yes, this will happen. But the choice is to make the change or greet the Final Solution because nothing lasts for ever, and there is going to be an end to the current situation however it happens.