Here is a golden opportunity to see how the Jewish design on
America
is executed in practice. Two articles were published on April 19, 2018 laying
out in detail how a strategy of “Confuse, Paralyze and Pivot” is used by the
Jews to keep America
as their eternal sucker.
One article came under the title: “Use Iran Sanctions to
Stop Assad” and the subtitle: “Allied cooperation in Syria offers a way to overcome
differences over the nuclear deal,” written by Mark Dubowitz and Richard
Goldberg, and published in the Wall Street Journal. The other article came
under the title: “Trump's Syria Strike Is a good Start,” written by Matthew
Brodsky and published in The Weekly Standard.
The Dubowitz/Goldberg article shows how the Jews interlace a
web of several issues to confuse the American foreign policy apparatus, thus
paralyze it before moving in on it and forcing it to serve the interests of
Israel instead of America's and those of the world. As to the Brodsky article;
it shows how the Jews move in after the paralysis, and guide America to self-immolate by neglecting to serve
its own interests and those of the world in favor of serving the interests of Israel .
Given that the most important concern of the Israelis at
this time relates to the growing ties that Iran is developing in the Middle
East, and the influence it is gaining as a result, you'll find that both
articles begin by discussing Syria to make it look like the writers are
interested in all matters relating to America's concern for the well being of
its citizens and the world. But when they are done with this topic, the writers
pivot to discuss Iran ,
making sure to place Israel 's
interests above those of America
and the world.
Not only that, but as you can see from the title of the
Dubowitz/Goldberg article, the authors took advantage of the fact that Assad is
the hour's hated man to make the devilishly twisted argument that tells how
Assad can be made to suffer even more. The argument goes something like this:
if America would punish Iran it would,
by the same token, punish Assad. Of course, the writers are not saying that
whereas Assad is America 's
current enemy, Iran is Israel 's most
feared enemy. And so, the net effect of the Jewish ruse in telling America how to move on Iran , boils down to stirring up America 's hatred and force it to do the dirty
work for Israel .
To develop that argument, the writers started the article
like this: “The debate in Washington has
centered on whether the strike against Syria went far enough. But policy
makers should consider another question … Iran
spent $ 15 billion last year to bolster its partner in Damascus .” And they came down hard on Iran ,
suggesting that the way to deal with it is to increase the financial pressures
on its economy. For this to succeed, they spoke of the necessity to draw the
Europeans into the effort. And this is where they employed another devilishly
twisted argument. Here, in brief, is what they said:
“Trump will soon decide on issuing a waiver suspending
sanctions on Iran 's
central bank. The U.S.
can offer a face-saving gesture to win European support. Rather than labeling
the reimposition of sanctions a way of nixing the nuclear deal, the president
should announce the move as a response to Iranian behavior in Syria ”.
In other words, the Jewish writers are telling America
to pull on the Europeans a trick of utmost hypocrisy considered by them to be
vintage Jewish. The trouble is that the Europeans have been punishing the Jews
throughout the centuries for practicing this kind of hypocrisy. The fact that America
will be the one pulling it this time will not diminish its sting. And the
Europeans will respond as they always do … with extreme indignation.
As to the Matthew Brodsky article, the writer has evoked the
name of former President Barack Obama 5 times to tell how bad he believes the
man had been for America .
But when he tried to explain that point, he revealed his true motives. It is
that he thought Obama put America 's
interests above those of Israel ,
and he didn't like it. And so he went on to tell the new president how to
proceed in the Middle East . Here is a
condensed version of that:
“Trump could have done far more to punish Assad; hit his
presidential palace in Damascus; leveled his summer residence and palace on the
coast; cratered his runways and airfields; destroyed his air assets and
targeted his air defense systems … The next step in Syria is finishing the job,
recognizing the military threat Iran poses and pivoting to the prevention of
additional gains by Iran”.