Would you believe that after all these years fighting to
make Israel the colossal
hegemon of the Middle East, Clifford D. May has abruptly turned against Israel ,
accusing it of being a stooge of Hamas?
After all, it was the Israelis who created Hamas for
whatever reason, but have decided to turn to the ancient pagan tradition of
fashioning the gods they wanted to worship. It could be that from the time the
Jews exited ancient Egypt ,
their secret wish had been to worship the fighting spirit they finally
instilled into Hamas.
True to the Jewish tradition of never being aboveboard or
direct or honest about anything, Clifford May took a long and winding road to
let it be known he has come to the belief that Israel exists for the sole
purpose of giving Hamas what it wants. If you think this is only a theory, you
can verify it yourself by reading Clifford May's latest article. It came under
the title: “For Hamas and its allies, the worse the better,” published on May
22, 2018 in The Washington Times.
Like the man says in the title, for Hamas, it is the worse
the better. So, guess what Israel
did to make it the best it can be for Hamas. Well, it made the situation the
worst it can be for them. Not only that, but Clifford May has also outed the
mole that's working for Hamas inside the concoction that is Israel . Would
you believe that the mole turned out to be none other than Benjamin Netanyahu?
Check it out yourself.
Recalling that it was Netanyahu the Bibi who stood firmly
against having a two-state solution all along, look what Clifford May is now
saying: “Hamas has said clearly the two-state solution is out of the question.”
It is clear that Netanyahu took this as command and reaffirmed it as follows:
The two-state solution on my dead body.
Do you know what else is amazing about May's column? It
seems to have been dictated by a Netanyahu aide. See for yourself. Speaking of
what Hamas did at the border between Gaza and Israel ,
Clifford May said the following: “This is a blatant violation of the law of
armed conflict.” Did you grasp the significance of this sentence, my friend? If
not, think back what happened at that border.
What happened is that the Palestinians went to the border
unarmed to have a demonstration on their side of the border. Standing safe
across the neutral zone hundreds of yards away, the Jews used long-range
American made lethal firearms to kill dozens of Palestinians. Well then, the
Jews being the only ones armed on that day, the law of armed conflict applies
only to them. Thus, what the Netanyahu aide did was to make sure the world will
note it was the Israeli military that blatantly violated the law of armed
conflict. It committed war crimes.
Do you want to know how else Clifford May has shown the
Israelis to be bloodthirsty? Look at this passage: “Commentators have insisted
that Gazans staged 'peaceful protests' while characterizing the Israeli
response as a 'slaughter.' Also widespread has been the baseless charge that
President Trump deserves blame.” The writer has juxtaposed two charges. One was
leveled by commentators against the Israeli military. The other was said to be
a widespread charge leveled against President Trump. The writer rejected the
charge against the American President but sustained that of the commentators
who denounced the Israeli military. Yes, the Israelis are bloodthirsty, said Clifford
May in his roundabout manner.
He did one more thing to expose the horrible kind of society
that the Jews have installed in what used to be the proverbial Garden of Eden.
Look at this passage: “Zionism originated as a movement to build a Jewish
state. Israel
became a refuge for Jews from around the world –– including thousands from Arab
and Muslim countries. They and their descendants today constitute half of Israel 's
population”.
There is no doubt that the intent behind the writing of that
passage was to show the world the extent to which the European Jews are
suppressing the Jewish population of Israel that's of Arab descent.
Instead of half the government being made of Jewish-Arab immigrants, there is
not a single minister of Arab descent in the government today. In the 70 years
that Israel
has been in existence, there has been only one minister of Moroccan descent,
and he didn't last long before he vanished. That’s Jewish style egalitarianism
for you.