If there are only two ways to doing something: the right way
and the wrong way; it follows that those who do the thing the right way are
legitimate operators, whereas those that do it the wrong way are illegitimate.
Note that the word “legitimate” is derived from the word
“legal,” which means that under any conceivable system of law, the things which
are done the right way will be sustained in a legal sense, whereas those which
are done the wrong way will be outlawed and rejected.
Now, when it comes to establishing an organization –– be it
a bingo club among friends or a transcontinental conglomerate among the peoples
of the world or a nation for those shunned by everyone –– the right way to
doing things is to begin by defining what would come under the heading, “Who we
are” and then putting together the organization. But if you see someone do the
process the other way around, as in building the organization first and then
struggling to define the “who we are,” you know they are imposters motivated by
criminal intent.
Street gangs do that. They begin as individual misfits who
meet each other by chance while committing mischief. They discover they can do
more for themselves by working together and so, they stay together. They add to
their group by recruiting individuals they encounter during the process of
committing criminal acts. And when they realize they have grown large enough to
look like a gang, they try to define themselves by the kind of goals they have
in mind and the kind of crimes they commit. That would be their version of “who
we are”.
Eventually some of the street gangs grow to become a
mafia-style international crime syndicate. They may even try to appropriate a
terrain on which to do military-style training, as did al-Qaeda in
Afghanistan. Or they may try to acquire the terrain outright and call it their
Caliphate as did the Islamic State in the Levant.
Whereas those who tried to establish an Islamic State in
such manner met with failure – opposed as they were by the existing Muslim
states which rejected their violent method – the people who tried to establish
a Jewish state succeeded initially because the world took pity on them for what
they suffered during the centuries. But once the Jews got what they wanted,
they shed the veneer of victimhood to reveal that underneath it, they wore not
a human skin but that of a virulent snake.
It turned out, the Jews are so adept at confusing the people
who pity them, they make it difficult for others to detect what they are up to.
Lucky for us, however, there came the proof –– courtesy of Shmuel Rosner ––
that the Jews are illegitimate imposters who should never have received the nod
to establish a state of their own, let alone do it at the expense of the
Palestinians. You'll find such proof in the article that came under the title:
“Israel's Conversion Dilemma,” written by Rosner and published on June 28, 2018
in the New York Times.
What Shmuel Rosner is saying in effect is that the people who
call themselves Jews have reversed the order of things. First, they got what
they wanted by force of arms the way that street gangs operate, and then tried
to define themselves as a nation the way that world class imposters do things.
What's even more vexing is that the so-called Jews can't
even define themselves after decades of futile attempts. Things got so bad that
Rosner offered his own suggestion on how to proceed with the thing. But in so
doing; he exposed the reality that the whole enterprise had been the work – not
of a people in distress – but a worldwide crime syndicate whose activities
distress the human race. What follows is a compilation of the pertinent
passages in Rosner's article, expressed in condensed form:
“Israel cannot define a Jew. The evidence came early this
month. Israel needs a definition of Jewishness because the Law of Return allows
any Jew to settle in Israel. A third of Jewish Israelis consider a person
Jewish if he or she merely 'feels Jewish.' Yes, it's pretty complicated. What
should Israel do? I believe it should consider forging a new path. Establish
the political leaders to determine the boundaries of Jewishness. This would be
a regime change. Serving in the Israeli army would be considered a show of
seriousness about wanting to join the Jewish people. The Jews will get a
process of conversion not to a version of a Jewish religion that most of them
do not practice”.