Two war stories will help us understand the performance of two
governing systems that have nothing to do with the war stories. The wars being
Vietnam and Korea, the governing systems being the organically evolved and the
artificially constructed.
Fed up being colonized by foreigners, the people of Vietnam
rose-up to expel the colonial power out of their land. America got sucked into
the fight, established bases in the south of the country, and fought to prevent
the nationalists of the North from liberating the South. America lost the war,
and Vietnam was united under the regime of the North. The gentle people of
Vietnam held no grudge against America that caused millions of dead, and
enormous destructions to the country's infrastructure ... described as
apocalyptic in scale.
Something close to that, but with a different outcome, happened
less than a generation earlier in Korea. The difference being that America was
comparatively more powerful at the time, and the nations of China and the
Soviet Union that were helping North Korea, were weaker than when they helped
Vietnam. For these reasons, America was not defeated in Korea but was not
victorious either, and Korea remains a divided country to this day. American troops
are stationed in the South, claiming to protect other nations in the region,
said to be allied with America.
The lesson we draw from this history is that the American
propaganda that was unleashed to explain the country's involvement in Vietnam
turned out to be false. The truth is that the people of Vietnam who fought to
liberate their country, were not evil and were not out to invade the world, or
subjugate anyone in it. But had the North Vietnamese not won the war, the
situation there would have resembled that of Korea where the North was forced
to improve its defenses to the point that six and a half decades later, tiny
North Korea is making superpower America tremble with fear for being vulnerable
to a nuclear attack.
When you put at one side of the table the reality of an Asian
people who forgave those that came from thousands of miles away to bomb and
defoliate their country, and kill their people — and when you put at the other
side of the table the fake American propaganda that used to paint the Asians as
evil characters deserving to have apocalypse inflicted on them, you realize
that something about America's governing system, and not the Asian, represents
a great danger to civilization if not to life on Earth.
In reality, America would have learned this lesson and changed for
the better, except that the Jews who now control its culture and many of its
institutions, are not allowing it to happen. This is glaringly evidenced by the
incessant Jewish demand that America arm itself and go inflict apocalypse
everywhere across the planet. One such voice is that of Clifford May the Jew,
whose latest demand for America to do just that, came under the title: “Why Kim
Jong-un must feel 'maximum pressure,'” a column that was published on March 19,
2019 in The Washington Times.
May began his presentation by telling that the leaders of the
United States and North Korea met to discuss a possible deal that would
normalize the relations between them, and permanently remove the threat of a
confrontation that has the potential to escalate to a nuclear exchange. He went
on to say that this round of talks did not go as well as expected between the
two sides, and then suggested the following:
“I'm rooting for those within the U.S. government who will argue
that it's time to apply sticks, rather than dangle carrots, time to begin a
maximum pressure campaign. Could maximum pressure lead Mr. Kim to the
conclusion that nuclear weapons imperil rather than protect his dynasty? We'll
never know unless we try”.
To the warmongers of the world, this was just the appetizer. In
fact, it did not take Clifford May long before he went on to unveil a long list
of ways by which America should use the economic sticks at its disposal to
ratchet up the pressure on North Korea. He then said this:
“What else should keep Mr. Kim awake at night? Mr. Trump showed
him a video promoting the benefits if he gives up his nukes. However, at one
point the video cuts to shots of missiles launching and fighter jets
scrambling. The film then seems to burn, and there is an explosion … Mr. Kim
needs to be convinced that such a scenario is credible. Joint US/South Korea
military exercises is one way to send that message”.
This kind of talk is how the mob of Jewish pundits spent decades
inciting America to turn itself into an agent of death and destruction hated by
a world that used to love it. But how did the Jews manage to do that? It was
easy for them. The following is an example, taken from Clifford May's column,
showing the approach that the Jews often take in such matters:
“If we do not prevent Mr. Kim from acquiring nuclear weapons that
he can deliver to American cities, efforts to prevent Iran from following suit
are sure to fail as well. The list of rogue and adversarial nuclear-armed
powers will grow thereafter”.
That is, the Jews spread fear among the population. Their message
has always been that if the people do not heed their warnings, bad things will
happen. And the Jews always conclude that because the best defense is the
offense, the good people must preemptively attack someone lest they be attacked
first.
But given that the Jews were in the Soviet Union and in other
countries throughout time, why did they not scare these people the way they now
scare Americans? Actually, the Jews scored partial successes with Stalin's
Soviet Union and colonialist France and Britain, but then failed. That's
because, democratic or authoritarian, those countries were governed by systems
different from America's.
Those systems evolved naturally over time, going through different
episodes. This has allowed for the bonds that hold the parts together to grow
strong. It is why the Jews could not rupture them.
By contrast, the American system was conceived artificially in a
convention of the Founding Fathers that was held not long ago. Thus, the bonds
holding the parts together remain fragile, which is why the Jews could break
them, and apply the divide-and-rule maxim.