Call it the perpetual wheel of Jewish misery. It is a rigid system
by which the Jews govern their lives as if caught in a vortex that allows no
modification even when the circumstances change.
This is how the system works: The Jews enter into a new community.
Once they get to know what's what and who's who in it, they behave in a manner
they know will vex the locals. But that's okay with them because by now, they
would have befriended enough people at the upper levels, they feel confident
they'll be protected. But the local masses see this turn of events as favoring
the Jews. They start to revolt, and the Jews double down on their vexing
behavior instead of keeping a low profile.
This begins the escalation cycle where the Jews raise the stakes,
and the locals split into a group that protests loudly, and a group that keeps
anger and frustration bottled up. You begin to see the occasional public
eruptions as if to send the Jews a message, but the latter ask for more
privileges, which they falsely claim will foster a better understanding between
them and the locals. Instead of this happening, however, things get worse, and
the Jews demand that the existing laws be amended. They also ask for new
Jewish-specific laws favoring them to be enacted, and punishment for the locals
who refuse to embrace them.
Depending on several factors — foremost among them, the economic
situation of the country and the local politics — the escalation will take one
of two directions. Either the cycle will end here and now with a massive
explosion that will resemble an anti-Jewish pogrom, or the events will revert
back to square one and begin a new cycle. This time, however, the cycle will
not run like the old one, given that the relationship between the two
communities will unfold in a climate of fear and mutual suspicion. What can be
predicted at this point, is that the new cycle will end badly.
A well-crafted article will give the reader the chance to make a
first assessment as to where the situation stands in America at this time. It
came under the title: “How Ilhan Omar is setting back legitimate debate of
Israeli policies,” written by Daniel Kurtzer and published on March 5, 2019 in
the New York Daily News.
The first thing that ought to jolt you, reading the title of the
article, is the pretense that there was a debate about Israeli policies in
North America. Worse is the claim that it was a “legitimate debate.” The truth
is, there was no debate in any sense of the word. Thus, the assessment made of
the situation, will be about the vacuous creation of someone's imagination. It
will reflect the Jewish collective state of mind. What follows is how Kurtzer
has imagined what Omar is saying and what she is doing:
“In recent years, we have seen a public debate that has been
legitimate. Omar is undermining the ability to conduct that debate. She ought
to stop. A few weeks into her tenure, she tweeted that American support for
Israel is all about money. She went from the frying pan into the fire, saying
that she wanted to talk about the political influence in this country that says
it is OK for people to push for allegiance to a foreign country. Democrats and
Republicans responded with criticism for Omar's echoing anti-Semitic tropes.
She denies she is anti-Semitic. She is naive, and as an elected official, she
has a duty to acquire an understanding of the inferences drawn from the things
she says”.
What Kurtzer calls public debates are those that took place in the
Jewish so-called think tanks which are populated by fanatic Jews going about
the business of spinning reality in accordance with the saying: There are two
sides to every “healthy” debate. There is the Jewish side that's told by Jews,
and there is the Arab side that's told by Jews. To non-Jews, this isn't a
debate; it is Jewish pornography masquerading as debate.
In addition to the Jewish porno-think-tanks, you had Wolf
Blitzer's CNN where a panel of half a dozen Jews with no Arab participation, used
to discuss Arab matters. You also had the Fox News Channel that got into the
business of inviting Arab and Muslim dissidents to come to the studio and trash
Arabs and Muslims in return for a hefty paycheck. That's not to forget the
printed media where slandering the Arabs and the Muslims became a blood sport
practiced by everyone that wanted to be “in the game”.
And so, Ilhan Omar came along and said, we should talk about the
role that money plays in politics, not only in terms of how it affects the dynamics
between the Left and the Right, but also how it affects the role that the
Judeo-Israeli lobby is playing among America's politicians. No, no, no, cried
Daniel Kurtzer, this will undermine the fictitious debate that's ongoing, and
Omar ought to stop. He went on to tell why she ought to stop.
Kurtzer does not claim there was a public demand for Omar to stop;
he knows the public loves her and wants to see more of what she says and does.
But he intimated that a number of “bipartisan” politicians — those most certainly
on the take — want her to stop. So now, you want to know what's left for Ilhan
Omar to do?
Actually, Daniel Kurtzer tells what that would be. He says that as
an elected official, Omar has the duty to acquire an understanding of what it
is that annoys the Jews. But how will she acquire such understanding? That's
when the explanation becomes a little tricky.
Normal, civilized human beings resolve a matter such as that by
having a public debate in which all the topics related to the subject-matter
are discussed by the participants. Human beings do that with the use of reason
and the power of speech. It is an approach which contrasts with that of animals
that have neither reason nor speech they can use. That's why the animals resort
to intimidation and coercion to force the opponent to submit. The Jews employ a
similar method, thus avoid debating an opponent in public. They simply will not
change the CNN or Fox formats to have a human-like civilized debate.