Thursday, August 29, 2019

The Rabbit Hole that trapped its own Rabbit

Let me start this discussion by stating a number of fundamental definitions to avoid getting sucked into the rabbit hole of Jewish haggling.

An occupied land is a war zone. The occupier is considered the aggressive war criminal no matter his excuses. His stock in trade is terror, mayhem and bloodshed. The occupied, on the other hand, is the victimized freedom fighter whose struggle is considered legitimate no matter how he finds it necessary to fight the fires of occupation with the fires he scrounges to gather.

When the occupier sends civilians into a war zone, he does so for one reason only. It is to get the civilian killed in the crossfire so that the occupier may blow his entrails out of his belly howling: Look what the resistance is doing. Pity me! Pity me! And while you're at it, can you spare a billion or two Benjamins … brother?

Two Jews were good enough to show us how their brethren blow their entrails out of the belly as they spread terror, mayhem and bloodshed in a region desecrated by Israel, then blame their heinous crimes on the victims they keep under occupation. Our two Jews are Moshe Phillips and Beth Bailey.

Moshe Phillips wrote: “Rashida Tlaib Condemns Terror Attack –– but not really,” an article that also came under the subtitle: “When is a 'condemnation' of a Palestinian Arab terrorist attack not a condemnation of a Palestinian Arab terrorist attack? When Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib is the person speaking. The article was published on August 27, 2019 in the Jewish publication, Algemeiner.

Beth Bailey wrote: “Rashida Tlaib Blames Israel For Terrorist Attack That killed Israeli Teen,” an article that also came under the subtitle: “Rep. Rashida Tlaib implied that policies of the Jewish state of Israel were somehow to blame for the heinous actions of terrorists who detonated a bomb.” The article was published on August 27, 2019 in the Jewish influenced publication, The Federalist.

Both Moshe Phillips and Beth Bailey took the typical Jewish approach of whining about someone (in this case Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib) doing nothing for the Jews, or doing so little it wasn't enough. What they wanted is what the Jews have always wanted: “a full-throated” condemnation of the victims (in this case, the Palestinians) for the terror of occupation that is maintained by the Jews, and for causing the death of civilians who were sent by Israel to die in the war zone known as the West Bank.

The two authors did not get what they hoped for from the American Congresswoman of Palestinian descent and so, in the name of the entire Jewish propaganda machine, they blew their own entrails howling: Look what the resistance is doing. Pity me! Pity me!

It is that Moshe Phillips wanted Rep. Tlaib to blame the victims for the sins of the aggressors … and that just didn't happen. As to Beth Bailey, she wanted Ms. Tlaib to label the resistance, “terrorists” instead of freedom fighters.

Terrorist being the label that was pinned on Nelson Mandela by the terrorist apartheid beasts in South Africa who spent a lifetime terrorizing Mandela till they could no more. We'll just have to wait and see if a similar moment of “could no more” will come to the Israeli beasts. That’s when they may decide to look up to human beings and step aside, letting the events take their natural course like it happened in South Africa.

The question now is this: Between now and then, where to from here? Well, each of the two Jewish writers has offered a thought. Speaking of Rashida Tlaib's duty, Moshe Phillips said this: “She can tell the Palestinians that murdering Jews is immoral, and that there can be no excuse for it.” As to Beth Bailey, she formulated her thoughts as follows:

“If our congresswoman continues to offer a one-sided truth about the Israel-Palestine conflict and fails to address the cult of 'heroic martyrdom' granted to those who kill Israelis, then it is the duty of Americans who support Israel to learn the truth and speak up loudly against Tlaib's emotionally charged lies”.

With regard to the saying of Moshe Phillips, it cannot be that he is ignorant of the fact that for every Jewish home-invader that's killed by the Palestinian owners of Palestine, a hundred Palestinians are killed by the invading Jews who came to kill them and rob them of their property. Thus, if Moshe Phillips believes that murdering Jews is immoral, he must also believe that Jews murdering Palestinians, is a hundred times more immoral. And he should strive to be human enough to say so in print. We look forward to that.

As to the saying of Beth Bailey, it cannot be that she is aware of what has been happening during the last two decades or so. It is that the American people –– unlike their zombie politicians –– did in fact take the trouble to learn the truth about the conflict in occupied Palestine. This is why they started speaking loudly against the tsunami of lies that the Jewish organizations have been pouring out for decades like a never-ending Niagara Falls.

The way forward is a deeper involvement by ordinary Americans on college campuses and elsewhere, or the Jewish lies will keep adding to the length of the hole, trapping its own rabbit deeper still.