If you want to know what happens to
someone when he combines extreme hatred for humanity and no understanding of
the history he is talking about –– you need to read Steven Emerson whose hatred
for the human race surpasses Hitler's hatred for the Jews. And you'll be amazed
how far into fake history an addict to fanaticism will go to look for and
gather the hate he'll want to spew at every event.
Once again, Steven Emerson has expressed
himself, this time in an article that came under the title: “Antisemite Billoo
Lashes Out After Being Dumped by Women's March,” published on September 20,
2019 in the Jewish online publication, Algemeiner.
The story on which he reported and about
which he pontificated, would have been told in a short paragraph were it not of
a kind that attracts the attention of a Jew who is motivated by extreme
fanaticism the way that Steven Emerson is. And so, he took an abnormal approach
and told a twisted story when he could have simply reported that Zahra Billoo
was appointed to the Board of the Women's March. When other members of the
board discovered that her views were at odds with theirs, they rescinded their
earlier decision. She tried to meet with them and discuss what just happened
but they declined the invitation. And so, she took to the tweeter and made her
views known to the public.
Instead of doing that, Emerson dragged
into the discussion other names, other topics and other false accusations with
the intent of associating what's happening today with what happened centuries
ago, and associating what's happening in America to what could happen to Israel
someday. In so doing, he propagated the false view that since the beginning of
time, humanity has been motivated by an evil streak called antisemitism, which
continues unabated to this day. His remedy is that the human race must accept
Jews as they are because non-Jews were wrong all along, whereas Jews were
right.
To stress that point, Steven Emerson
dragged Linda Sarsour into the discussion and accused her of pushing
blood-libel. This is such a horrendous thing to say in the twenty-first
century, it is proof that Emerson knows not the history of blood-libel. And so,
for his benefit, here is that history in brief. When the Romans kicked the Jews
out of Palestine they had occupied for a short period of time, the Jews settled
in Europe. They bragged to the Europeans about their importance, claiming to be
the chosen children of a God that got them out of Egypt. They also claimed He
allowed them to kill the children of the land and loot its treasures. But for
the divine scheme to succeed, the Jews had to hurry-up and not wait for the
bread to rise before baking it.
At first, the Europeans did not see
anything wrong with that story. But after a while, they began to suspect that
the disappearance of their own children had something to do with the Jews who
lived in impenetrable ghettos. They put two and two together, and came up with
the theory that when in Egypt, the Jews must have used the blood of children to
make the unleavened bread, and that they are repeating the gruesome ritual with
the children they are kidnapping in Europe.
That theory was false. The truth is that
the Jews kidnapped Nordic-looking children to raise as Jews in the ghetto.
Discriminated against because of their Jewish appearance, the Jews crossbred
with the European specimen they kidnapped, thus produced new generations of
Jews that had more of a European look; one that was acceptable to the locals.
This is the story of blood-libel that Emerson is falsely accusing Sarsour of
propagating. In fact, the woman said nothing of the sort, but Emerson’s
accusation goes to prove that when it comes to history, Emerson like all Jews,
is incapable of grasping the reality of a historical event.
Another lie that Emerson and most Jewish
propagandists are pushing, is that of accusing the people who criticize the
status quo, of encouraging the wiping of Israel off the map. But the truth is
that nobody wants to wipe Palestine-cum-Israel off the map. Palestine is still
Palestine though occupied, and these people want to see it remain on the map.
They also want to restore to it the status quo ante, which consists of a free
Palestine stretching from the river to the sea, a sovereign Arab state that
contains within it a self-governing homeland for the Jews as mandated by the
United Nations.
And then, there is this bizarre complaint
by Steven Emerson: “Billoo, who compares American Jews who move to Israel and
join its army to ISIS terrorists.” In fact, this view applies not only to
American Jews fighting for Israel, but to any Jew or gentile that volunteers to
fight for the Jewish State or the Islamic State.
The practice of enemy combatants joining a
foreign legion, has been a fact in every war since the beginning of time. And
the reality has always been that one army's hero is another army's enemy or
terrorist.
There is nothing in that definition which
exempts American Jews from being seen for what they are: Mercenaries engaged in
a foreign war that was not declared by America against the people of Palestine
or any of the frontline states from Lebanon to Gaza. These characters may be
heroes to the Israelis and their friends; they are terrorist enemies to those
they came to kill and their friends.