Ever since it was discovered that the
pendulum is the mechanism by which time can be measured accurately, the idea of
events recurring in cycles took hold. Aside from a few exceptions, most
cultures have come to accept the notion that what's happening today has
happened yesterday. They also came to accept the rule that it will happen again
tomorrow because such is the cyclical rhythm of life.
One of the exceptions to that rule, are
the Jews who planted themselves into the past so solidly, they lost cognizance
of the concept which refers to the passage of time. To the Jews, the present is
the permanent representation of the past, a condition they believe will remain
static till the advent of the messiah who will establish a set of new
circumstances and make it the unchanging reality in a future that will last to
eternity.
An article that helps the study of this
condition came under the title: “Ignoring anti-Semitic assaults signals that
Jewish blood doesn't matter when it can't easily be politically exploited,”
written by Philip Klein and published on August 30, 2019 in the Washington
Examiner.
This is where the Jews appear totally
oblivious of the reality that danger doesn't happen spontaneously without a
good reason but happens as a result of a cause-and-effect that is cyclical in
nature. It is cyclical due to the last effect becoming the cause that starts
the next cycle.
In fact, the first sentence in the Philip
Klein article establishes one of the realities of Jewish misery. It is that the
Jews are so lacking in imagination, hundreds wait patiently for one of them to
come up with an idea they can peddle as the collective one-voice emanating from
the mob of Jewish punditry. When it happens that someone gets hit with a lucky
idea, hundreds of them pounce on it, and repeat it ad infinitum, making themselves
sound like a disturbed beehive buzzing with excitement.
Here is that first sentence: “Last month,
Tablet's Armin Rosen wrote a disturbing piece on the rise of hate crimes
against identifiable Jewish New Yorkers, writing, 'Jews are routinely being
attacked in the streets of New York City. So why is no one acting like it's a
big deal?'” Beside showing that Philip Klein is advancing further the argument
started by Armin Rosen, the article demonstrates that the Jews continue to
insist that anything happening to them must become a big deal, and that
everyone must rally around the beleaguered Jews to protect them. Rosen and
Klein want this to become a habit without the Jews taking any responsibility
for what's happening to them, and without them doing anything to help others
help them. Imagine!
Here again, Philip Klein found a way to
blame the inaction of others on both “something else” and “someone else,”
rather than blame it––if only partially––on the Jews themselves. So, here it
is, in condensed form, what Klein has said in this regard:
“In New York City the situation for
observant Jews is quickly devolving … Jews cannot safely walk to synagogue or
through the streets wearing a yarmulke without being attacked verbally or
physically. This is a disgrace. Why is everybody standing pat as Jews get
targeted where they should feel safe? The simple answer is that highlighting
the attacks does not provide any clear partisan advantage”.
But then, in the time-honored Jewish
tradition of shooting themselves in the foot, Philip Klein shot himself in the
foot. He thus nullified what he just said––even went beyond nullification. He
did that in two installments, so here is what he said first:
“It would be difficult to tie the attacks
in Brooklyn to President Trump or to white nationalism or to Rep. Ilhan Omar.
This is a failure of mayor Bill DeBlasio who tweets about anti-Semitism while
standing idly by as it rages in his city. It is also the failure of major
Jewish organizations that have collected tens of millions in donations to fight
anti-Semitism and yet have proven useless in pressuring politicians to take
action”.
And here is what Philip Klein went on to
say:
“As Rosen wrote, 'The fact that the
victims are religious Jews, and the perpetrators are black and Hispanic,
inverts the perpetrator-victim dynamics with which Jewish organizations are
comfortable.' Anti-Semitism comes in many forms and is not confined to any ideological
camp. It is not attached to politics at all. The effective way to fight
anti-Semitism is to fight it in all its manifestations, free from political
blinders”.
But if nothing tangible and no one alive can
be held responsible for what's happening to the Jews, please explain against
what or whom should the politicians act? Well, it is evident from the absurdity
of the Philip Klein suggestion, that he is missing something. What could it be?
There is only one answer to that question.
It is this: The Jews and only the Jews are responsible for what's happening to
them. It follows that only they can fix their problem.
They may begin by ending the habit of
running to someone and ask them to chastise others for sins they did not
commit, while praising the Jews for virtues they never displayed.