Thursday, October 24, 2019

A Friend that milks you is no Friend at all

Operators of the Jewish propaganda machine have been exploiting America by hypnotizing its ruling class with the assurance that Israel was a good friend of America.

However, the problem has always been that those operators never gave a practical definition for the label “friend,” any more than they did for any label they slapped on whom they praised and whom they maligned. And so, no sane person outside of America's ruling class, paid much attention to the idea of Israel being a friend of America. It is just that nobody cared ... but this may be about to change.

What happened is that Clifford D. May, who is more than an average cog in the Jewish propaganda machine, has written a column about the Kurds, calling them the best friends that America had in the Muslim World. In so doing, what he wrote will stand as the definition of the term “friend.” This being the case, it will be taken that the definition which applies to the Kurds must also apply to Israel. Good or bad, whatever the definition will turn out to be, it will come to the attention of the American public as well as that of the ruling class … the group that needs to know about it more than anyone else.

Clifford May's column came under the title: “The Kurds are not angels,” and the subtitle: “Among Muslim nations, America has had no better friend,” published on October 22, 2019 in The Washington Times. That title does not reflect what May thinks of the Kurds. It is how President Donald Trump described the Kurds, to which Clifford May responded with what amounts to: Yes but...

May went on to explain that angels don't make great soldiers. But the important thing is that the Kurds were trained by the Americans to be effective soldiers. To that end, they were given assistance, advice and combat air support, and were let loose to go after the soldiers of the alarming Islamic State, known as ISIS. Because this alone does not make it sound like the Kurds were friends of America, you go over the article once more, looking for something that deserves being labeled: Good friend. But you find none.

Puzzled and curious about the kind of relationship that the Kurds had with America –– that which prompted Clifford May to characterize with the phrase: “America has had no better friend” –– you analyze every word that May wrote in his column, and what you come up with is the following:

“Many of the Kurds were members of a group designated as a terrorist organization by the United States. That's what Trump had in mind when he said the Kurds are not angels. But the Kurds are diverse. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed after World War I, the lands on which the Kurds lived, were divided among Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria. Today, the Kurds comprise a 'nation' without a state of its own. I'm convinced that most of them have no higher priority than to preserve their culture and speak their own language”.

From this, you deduce that to be a best friend of America, all you need to do is develop a “high priority” for grabbing properties that belong to someone else, turn to terrorism to get them, and call on the Americans to give you assistance, advice and combat air support. When this is done, you will have attracted the attention of the Jews who will joyfully whisper in your ear: “We are so much alike, we'll get the politico-journalistic suckers of America to work on getting you what else you want”.

This absurd masquerade so closely resembles Israel's relationship with America, it explains why the Jews insist on calling Israel America's friend. Upon reflection, this saga makes you wonder what the Jews were thinking when the Arabs formed a military coalition with America during the First Iraq War, and fought together, not to grab what belongs to someone else, but to chase away an invader that was trying to grab someone's property. Were the Arabs the best friends of America in the eyes of the Jews at the time? Whether the answer is yes or no, how do they characterize that relationship now?

The other burning question is this: Will the ruling class of America come out of its hypnotic trance, see what the Jews are doing to America, and respond to their demands with a terse: take a hike, kid?

Like a victim that was hypnotized and programmed by a religious cult to worship false gods, and in desperate need to be deprogrammed as well as reeducated to get acquainted with everything that used to be his life, the ruling class of America needs to be deprogrammed and reeducated. If this is done, it will not be the first time that the country will have gone through an experience at this level of trauma.

The worrying part, of course, is that when something like this takes place to a nation, the deprogramming brings with it unsettled times that can last for a while.

Even though the Americans pride themselves on their ability to peacefully transform from one state to another, it remains to be seen if they will get rid of the Jewish tyranny without going through a disruptive convulsion.