You probably never heard someone say the
three words, “Lysergic Acid Diethylamide.” They are better known as LSD, which
is a potent hallucinogenic drug. It was widely used by people of all ages
during the decades of the 1960s and 1970s.
Those who used that drug became so stoned,
it was no surprise when a regular user suggested that to make the world a
better place, someone ought to fill a fleet of water-bomber airplanes with LSD
and spray the whole country from the air so that everybody gets high and become
a peace-loving dude.
Well, my friend, suppose that a mad
scientist invented such a drug with the added feature that its effect does not
wane with time. Once used, it keeps the user into a permanent psychedelic
trance, and not just in a state of peaceful bliss. The scientist made it so
that those who inhale the drug become wedded to the last message they heard
before inhaling.
Having perfected the drug, the scientist
then does two things. He authors a message and disguises it as a commercial. He
has it distributed as a flier to all the households in the town where he was
born and grew up. He has the message printed in the local newspaper, and
broadcast on the local radio station. He also rents a water-bomber, and uses it
to spray the town from one end to the other. The result is that everyone
becomes permanently wedded to his message.
And what the message says, in essence, is
that all those living in this ethnically diverse town should think of
themselves, not as being originally from Asia or Africa or Europe or Latin
America or whatever, but as descendants of a tribe that was chosen by God to
inherit the Earth and all that's in it. For this reason, the whole country,
indeed, “the world has certain moral responsibilities and obligations towards
us. First and foremost ought to be the simple elemental recognition and respect
–– the radical admission that we do exist”.
Far-fetched, you say? Well, let me ask you
this: Did you think for a moment that the assertion made above and placed
between quotation marks, was an invention of mine? Or did you think that
someone uttered these words to make the point that was analogized by the story
of the mad scientist? Whatever you may think, the truth is that a Jew actually
authored these words and stuck them at the end of an article he wrote under the
title: “Why Anti-Zionism is Worse Than Antisemitism,” written by Benjamin
Kerstein and published on October 23, 2019 in Algemeiner.
Kerstein's point is that all Jews are one
and the same people whether they are White, Black, Yellow, Brown or red
skinned. They are one and the same people whether they just converted to
Judaism, or they are children of the first generation converts to Judaism, or
the second generation or the tenth or even before that. They are one and the
same people, says Kerstein, if they are half Jews, or a quarter Jews or a
smaller fraction than that. In fact, they are Jews if they have as little as
one drop of Jewish blood in them … or not even that much, as long as they feel
like Jews.
But what is it that prompted this guy,
Benjamin Kerstein, to go into the trouble of arguing that a mixture is not a
mixture but a homogeneous mass that happens to have different colors, different
vibrations, different scents, different flavors, different customs and so on
... and so on ... and so on? The answer is that by the power of his twisted
logic, Kerstein has determined that if it can be argued that a mishmash of Jews
represents one and the same thing, all the Jews, wherever they happen to live,
will have the right to do what no one else is allowed to do.
That is, it has been resolved in the
twisted mind of Kerstein, that whereas all the Greeks in the world could not go
to Greece, push away the people that never left the place, and take it for
themselves, the Jews from anywhere in the world have the right to go to
Palestine, push away the people that never left the place, and take it for
themselves. In fact, the rule that applies to the Greeks but not the Jews,
applies to everyone else on the planet, be they White, Black, Yellow, Brown or
red skinned.
To make his point, Kerstein contrived an
argument that –– if composed by a non-Jew –– would have sent its author to a
mental institution. But because the argument was composed by a Jew, it was
considered worthy of printing in a publication that is supported by taxpayer
money. Here is the argument that Kerstein made:
“The Jews are not a people is a remarkable
statement because it is quite unprecedented. Throughout the long history of
philo- and antisemitism, non-Jews never claimed that the Jews were not a
people. Christianity and Islam always acknowledged that they constituted a
nation. An official of the French revolutionaries once said, 'For the Jews as a
people, nothing; for the Jew as a citizen, everything,' something that could
not have been said if the Jews had not been a people”.