Under normal circumstances, the difference between being correct
and wise, and being correct but unwise, is that the first posture results from
having experienced the reality of life as it is, whereas the second posture
results from imagining the ideal life as it ought to be.
However, because there is a time to adopt one posture, and a time
to adopt the other posture, no surefire rule of thumb can be devised for the
blind adoption of either posture without having to make a judgment based on the
particulars of each case as it presents itself. This is when both realism and
idealism must be combined to help form a judgment that is both practical and
wise.
A situation that has existed for centuries, and has affected just
about everyone on the planet, is that which is known as the Jewish question. By
now, no one doubts that there is an element of incompatibility between the
Jewish mode of interacting with others, and the various modes which are generally
followed and accepted by humanity. In fact, the behavior of the Jews has caused
the human race to suffer enormously time after time; a cycle that is repeating
itself at this moment around the globe. It is why the time has come to confront
the issue, and speak about it freely and openly.
The reason why I feel compelled to make that kind of plea, living
as I do on a continent that pretends to bask in the glory of a freedom of
speech that nobody else enjoys, is that contrary to the mistaken belief, North
America is now the most repressive place on the planet when it comes to
speaking freely and openly about the Jewish question. It is no exaggeration to
say that no dictator that ever lived, had control over his subjects like what
the Jews have over nearly 400 million totally muzzled North American subjects.
The difference between the regular dictators and the Jews, is that
the regular type put down the rules, play by them, and expect you to do
likewise. If you don't, they'll punish you for breaking the rules. With these
dictators, you know what you're getting into, know what choices you have and
know what consequences every choice entail. By contrast, the Jews put down the
rules so that they know where you'll be at any moment. When you get there,
you'll find they are also there expecting you to sing their praises. If you
perform well, they'll give you a new assignment. If you don't, they'll kneecap
you and throw you to the wolves.
Two articles show how the Jews have taken control of America's
foreign policy and made a mess of it. Two other articles show how the Jews took
control of America's domestic policy and made a mess of it. We begin with the
latter. They are: First, “Rashida Tlaib Endorses Prominent Antisemite –– and No
One Cares,” written by Petra Marquardt-Bigman and published on September 23,
2019 in the Jewish publication, Algemeiner. Second, “Columbia welcomes hate
speech as long as it's anti-Semitic,” written by the editors of the New York
Post and published on September 24,2019.
Look how Petra Bigman starts her article: “It is rather shocking
to contemplate the implications of US Rep. Rasida Tlaib's unequivocal support
for Zahra Billoo.” This is a Jew telling one American she must hate another
American. Do you know why no dictator ever asked his people to do that? Because
their people would have given them the Vietnamese treatment. Do you know what
that is? I'll tell you what it is:
Every time the Vietnamese downed a warplane and captured an
American pilot, they would put him in a cage of the kind they used to transport
wild animals. They would drive the pilot in his cage around the city for the
citizens to see the creature that came from thousands of miles away to kill
them in their homes. Well, it is time for the American people to contemplate inflicting
a similar treatment on the Jews that dare to tell one American he or she must
hate another American.
As to the editors of the New York Post, their piece exhibits the
classic Jewish exercise of carrying on with two contradictory discourses simultaneously.
One discourse says that a speech which does not praise Israel and/or the Jews
is antisemitic, and must be prohibited. The other discourse says that a speech
condemning the chosen enemies of the Jews, no matter how false or vile it may
be, must be considered a true expression of free speech, and be praised.
As to the articles that show how the Jews have taken control of
America's foreign policy and made a mess of it, they are: First, “Iran, Trump,
and 2020,” written by Jonathan Weaver and published on September 27, 2019 in
the American Thinker. Second, “An 'America First' foreign policy doesn't
include regime change in Syria,” written by the editors of the Washington
Examiner, and published on September 28, 2019.
Having hammered the Obama administration, asking it to refrain
from adopting the Iran nuclear deal but failed to do so, and having hammered
the Trump administration to abandon the deal and succeeded to do so, the Jews
saw how foolish they have been. And so, they are now using the voice of
Jonathan Weaver to beg America to reverse course. The way they are doing it, is
through the use of the classic Jewish approach. They are telling Donald Trump
that the way to win the next election is to readopt the nuclear deal he
abandoned not long ago at heir behest.
Similarly, having hammered every administration, going back
several decades, to effectuate regime change in every Arab and Muslim country
that did not befriend Israel, the editors of the Washington Examiner have
realized how foolish they have been. So now, they are telling Donald Trump not
to do to Syria what America did to Iraq and Libya at their behest.
This horrendously idiotic way to run a country, let alone a
superpower, was made possible because the Jews recognized at the outset that to
play America like a broken fiddle, they first had to shut everybody up. This
done, they used the country's institutions to do what they want, and got the
people running the institutions to sing the praises of the Jews.