Friday, July 31, 2020

How they brought authoritarian rule with them

One day, long ago, I rode the subway, and it just happened that I found on the empty seat beside me the editorial page of a Newspaper I had stopped reading long before. So, for the heck of it, I picked up that page and read an editorial that could have given me a heart attack years before I had an actual one.

I cannot remember the title of the piece, but the text of the editorial was a short thing bursting with anti-Arab diatribes that gave no basis for throwing insults at the Arabs, except for making the false accusation that the Arabs who come to Canada bring with them arguments they have in the old countries. And so, the editorial advised the Arabs to stop spreading their propaganda in this country.

Imagine how I felt when I saw that piece of garbage, knowing that dozens of Jewish and non-Jewish publications printed in Canada and the US, as well as dozens of radio and television stations ... all of them hosting Jews and their lackeys but no Arabs, espousing the Judeo-Israeli point of view. And this was happening at a time when you'd be hard-pressed to find a letter to the editor from an Arab, printed in a Canadian newspaper even if you were patient enough to spend a decade or two looking for one.

The thrust of the Jewish effort to indoctrinate the public, was built on the idea of making the people believe that the Arabs were trying to rob them of their liberties, and that the Jews were here to protect their liberties. This being the exact opposite of what was happening, as anyone that had eyes and ears could see and hear, the Jews eroded their own credibility by themselves with no one standing beside them to help them.

Fast forward to the year 2020, when even the Jews who grew up being fed the Jewish propaganda with their mothers' milk, began to taste the rotten quality of what their leaders were forcing them to consume. So, guess what's happening now, my friend. Well, let me tell you that you can see what's happening by reading the article which came under the title: “Why Seth Rogen's Anti-Israel Rant Matters,” and the subtitle: “He overlooks the reasons Israel was founded in the first place, and what makes it unique today.” It was written by David Harsanyi, and published on July 29, 2020 in National Review Online.

The story that Harsanyi tells, is that of Seth Rogen, a Jew whose parents first met in an Israeli Kibbutz, then traveled to America where they got married and settled in the new country. They begot Seth, raised him in the Jewish tradition and taught him all that's necessary to know about Jewish life, and how all of this relates to the creation and continued existence of Israel.

But then, like many young Jews these days, Seth Rogen began to realize that the narrative from which he was told to draw inspiration, turned out to be nothing more than a massive edifice made of cardboard blocks stuck together with chewing gum, yet sold as the Rock of Gibraltar that will never be shaken. And Seth Rogen spoke his mind, expressing doubts about the whole idea.

Enter David Harsanyi who decided to respond to Rogen. To that end, Harsanyi adopted the standard Jewish formula of starting a response by attacking Rogen. He did the following, having forgotten or perhaps not knowing, that Seth Rogen exists today because there was a Kibbutz in Israel where Harsanyi never spent a day in his life:

“You probably won't be surprised to learn that Seth Rogen has, at best, a facile understanding of basic history, faith, or politics. We shouldn't expect anything else. The problem, though, is that Rogen increasingly feels the need to share his illiterate opinions about serious issues with millions of people”.

And the rest of the Harsanyi article rests on that last point: “sharing opinions with millions of people.” This forces the question: Who may be granted the right to share their opinion with the public, and who may be denied that right? So, I ask you this question, dear reader: Do you see shades of Nazism, Fascism or Communism in Harsanyi's ideas? If you detect any of that, just remember that it wasn't the Arabs who brought these ideas to North America; it was Jews of the David Harsanyi variety. And yet, it is the Arabs who are regularly blamed for the sins committed by Jews. Look now what David Harsanyi inserted in the last paragraph of his article:

“People who challenge the status quo for the sake of challenging the status quo have the intellectual sophistication of a child –– which is fine if that child isn't given a massive megaphone”.

The megaphone being access to the media. Harsanyi wants to deny that access to the people whom he decides are challenging the status quo for no good reason. So, I repeat my earlier question to you, my friend: “Do you see shades of Nazism, Fascism or Communism in Harsanyi's ideas”?