Late in the year 2007 two
things happened that remain memorable to me. I launched this blog and the
Annapolis Conference had started and was still ongoing.
I had learned a great deal about
the Jews by that time, but not enough to see through their bad faith. And yet,
this was something I needed badly to temper my optimism, and be warned that the
Jews would torpedo the peace process because their hunger to steal what belongs
to others, exceeded their desire to live a normal life. And so, I foolishly
stood in opposition to those who were predicting the failure of the Conference;
I even criticized them bitterly.
Now, thirteen years later, a
new attempt at forging a comprehensive peace deal in the Middle East has just
started, and I'm not going to express optimism or pessimism as to the outcome.
What I'll do is observe the events as they unfold, parse them as best I can,
and report to my readers what I see is unfolding, and what I believe is
happening.
From the deluge of news items
and opinion pieces that have flooded the information landscape lately, I pick
three pieces for review because I believe they adequately represent the big
picture. They are: (1) The Israel-UAE agreement is a key step for peace and
sends a crucial message to Palestinians,” written by Dennis Ross and published
on August 13, 2020 in The Washington Post; (2) “A huge triumph for Israel, Bibi
–– and Trump,” an editorial of the New York Post that was published on August 13,
2020; and (3) “Tlaib Slams Israel-UAE Deal: 'We Won't Celebrate Netanyahu for
Not Stealing Land,' written by Zachary Evans and published on August 13, 2020
in National Review Online.
Dennis Ross is one of those
Jews who spent his professional life being paid by the American government
while pretending to work for America when in reality, he was working for the
Israeli government to the detriment of America's interests as well as those of
the Palestinians. When he left the government, he partnered with every Jewish
organization and publication that would take him, to propagandize the
Judeo-Israeli causes. He did that till Netanyahu's decision to annex rumps of
the Palestinian West Bank, a move that in Dennis Ross's view will dilute the
Jewishness of Israel. And so, he opposed it.
Ross seems happy with the
agreement-in-the-making that's shaping between the UAE and Israel because it
gives Israel everything that the fanatic Jews have always wanted without
diluting the entity's Jewishness. Indeed, Dennis Ross has come to realize that
the Palestinians are not going anywhere, no matter how brutally the American
equipped and financed army and settlers treat them. But this does not mean that
he sympathizes with their plight. On the contrary, he hates them with every
fiber in his body, and he seizes every occasion to denigrate them.
Though requiring a thorough
reinterpretation, the most useful part that can be taken away from the Dennis
Ross article, is contained in the following passage:
“This may seem surprising,
since the Emirates have neither been in the forefront of peace-making diplomacy
nor had a good relationship with President Abbas of the PA. And yet, because
Crown Prince Mohammad bin Zayed and other leaders believe that Israeli
annexation would kill the possibility of two states, they decided to offer
normalization. They understood that this move would preserve the option for a
two-state solution and preempt Iran from exploiting the anger that annexation
would likely produce to serve their aims in the region”.
This is baloney, of course,
since the event that caused the breakthrough was the phone call that Trump made
to Zayed and Netanyahu. Meanwhile, the Emirates did not offer something that
isn't already in the 2002 Arab League Initiative. It had been sitting on the
table as a take it or leave it proposition. That was the Arab incentive to
encourage the Jews to get civilized, but that's not how the Jews operate,
unfortunately.
What the Jews constantly look
for is leverage they can use to force others to bend to their will. Since they
cannot develop leverage on their own, they look for suckers to use as leverage.
The Americans fit the bill exactly right, and the Jews have been suckering them
for decades. This resulted in Donald Trump hearing the American people say
enough is enough. And so, he decided to pull the plug on Netanyahu, causing
him to grumble and whine like a child that had the lollipop taken away from
him.
As to the editorial of the New
York Post; it is typical of what you’d expect from the Neocons. They want their
readers to believe that Trump and the Bibi conspired in secret to bluff the
Emirates, making them believe that Israel will annex parts of Palestine unless
they say “Yes, Sir” when Trump calls to tell them, they must love Israel and
the Jews, or the Palestinians will lose yet another chunk of their beloved
homeland. And the Emirates capitulated on the spot, fell to their knees, and
cried out: “Please, please, please, don't do it. We're ready and willing to do
anything you say.” Well, my friend, there is an English expression that tells
what that is. It sounds like this: bullshit!
And then, there is the Zachary
Evans piece. He reported on what Representative Rashida Tlaib has said upon
hearing the news. She is American-born of Palestinian descent, serving her
American constituents in America. He is a Jew that did not serve in the
American military but served in the Israeli military.
Instead of starting the piece
by telling his readers what Tlaib had said, and then tell them what else he
observed, he started by saying that Rashida Tlaib was a supporter of BDS. He
then went on to tell what she had said, which is this:
“We won't celebrate Netanyahu
for not stealing land he already controls … The heart of the issue has never
been planned, formal annexation, but ongoing, devastating apartheid … This deal
will not alleviate Palestinian suffering––it will further normalize it”.
And then, like a dedicated
Fifth Columnist with a mandate from the Jewish Central Command to stealthily chip
away at the American Constitution, the Israeli soldier––now disguised as an
American Journalist––went on to make a mockery of the right to free association
and free assembly, heretofore thought to be unalienable rights guaranteed by
the Constitution to every American.
But why would the Jewish
Central Command go as far as that to denigrate one of the most important
provisions in the Constitution? They do it all the time because they want the
State Legislatures and the Federal Congress to rob the American people of the
right to exercise another provision in the Constitution: the freedom to choose
between adopting BDS or rejecting it.
That's that for now. So, guess
what will happen going forward. The Jewish Central Command will assemble the
most formidable prostitutes it has under its wing, and send them to tell Donald
Trump he must allow the Bibi of Israel to have his cake and eat it too. That
is, he will support the Bibi saying that he will annex Palestinian lands at a
future date, and if he (Trump) would still be President; he will wholeheartedly
support his move.