When there is a general
consensus throughout society that something is bad –– for example the 9/11
attack on the New York twin towers –– and someone expresses doubts about the
identity of the culprits, such as calling the attack an “inside job,” you build
a case against that someone by cataloging what they say.
What you do, is document what
the person has said and continues to say by drawing up a list of such
utterances, where he uttered them and when he did. The list becomes a valuable
piece of evidence when used to have the person condemned for their stance on
the issue.
But what happens when there is
no general consensus that something is either good or bad –– for example
drilling for and exploiting the resources off the coast of Alaska –– and
someone advocates for one side of the argument while someone else advocates for
the other side, each drawing up a list to document and support their case?
Well, the fact is that most of what goes on in everyday life, falls into this
category. It is what the marketplace of ideas has to deal with every day of the
week.
So then, what happens when
there is a case that used to be viewed in a given way by society, and then a
reversal takes place, and now society views the case differently? First of all,
let it be known, it is not often that something like this happens. However, one
is unfolding at this time, and you can get acquainted with it by reading the
article that came under the title: “Anti-Israel animus has run amok among young
Americans.” It was written by Eitan Fischberger and published on August 6, 2020
in the New York Daily News.
There was a time when the
American society was totally ignorant of Middle Eastern affairs. You would have
found this to be true, were you to probe the most disinterested lay people in
foreign affairs. It was also true among most employees staffing the American
State Department; the very people who were in charge of implementing the
country's foreign policy. This condition gave the Jews the opportunity to
design and implement the paradigm that reigned more tightly in America than
Nazism was ever able to grab the hearts, minds and souls of “Hitler's
Executioners”.
It took half a century and the
advent of the internet to cause a crack in the iron curtain that the Jews had
erected around America and the other English-speaking countries to prevent the
truth from going through. The fresh air of truth that blew into these places
through the crack, was welcomed by the societies that were drowning in the dark
of Jewish propaganda, and didn't know it till they felt the elixir of
independent thinking hug them and revive every cell in their bodies that were
numbed by Jewish deception, lies and doubletalk.
The college and university
campuses that were turned into graveyards of thought, and were overseen by
Jewish commissars of the correct thinking, saw the rise from the graves of the
murdered souls, now demanding to live again the way they did before the KOOL
AID of Jewish totalitarian tyranny, disguised as democracy, had murdered them.
And so, the general consensus as to what was good and what was bad, saw a
reversal like it never happened since the days when humanity became aware of
the evil that was perpetuated by Nazism and Fascism –– and rejected the
murderous ideologies.
When such reversal took place
in North America, the old commissars guarding the graveyards of independent
thinking, ran in all directions like cockroaches hit by fresh air and sunshine.
But instead of joining in the activities of the marketplace of ideas, the
commissars cum Jewish lobbyists activated the tricks by which they gathered
dirt on prominent people, such as politicians and journalists, and whispered in
their ears what they must say and do, or face the consequences of the skeletons
in their closet being revealed to the world.
A battle royale has been
raging ever since between the commissars and the freedom fighters who find
themselves headquartered on America's campuses defending the last bastion of
free and independent thinking in the country. Seeing this movement grow and
gain strength, the commissars of the graveyards started to recruit young men
and women, and prepared them to infiltrate the campuses of the nation with
instructions to disrupt the work of the freedom fighters. But as you'll see
when you read the article, the recruits came armed with the now useless art of
cataloging the activities of their nemeses, only to see their effort backfire
on them.
One of the recruits is Eitan
Fischberger whose article contains the following collection of passages:
“It is student groups that
have truly taken the lead this time around. They proved their ability to
coordinate various protests on a national level. Protesters held signs
supporting BLM [Black Lives Matter] and the Palestine Liberation Organization.
They hijack political issues, not realizing they are undermining their own
cause in the process”.