The time has long
passed when the world can continue to view these machinations as a case of the
kid who cried wolf when there was no wolf around to do battle with. The
machinations are clearly a concerted effort that is mounted by a well organized
and well financed group with an agenda whose main characteristic is that it can
be implemented only when the world is permanently on edge or preferably at war.
It is time that we recognize this phenomenon for what it is so that we may put
an end to it before it puts an end to us.
Another contribution
to the already long list of submissions that have been feeding those
machinations, was made by Clifford D. May when he added to the pile, a column
that came under the title: “Failing to Know Our Enemies” and the subtitle:
“Those committed to liberty are our friends for the long haul; those intent on
destroying it are not.” Published on December 19, 2013 in National Review
Online, the new leg of machinations begins with a quote from a speech that was
delivered by John Kennedy during the Cold War. He promised then that America will
assure the survival and success of liberty.
Without mentioning
or even hinting that there is a difference between our time and that of the
Kennedy era, the author defines the deficiencies in America 's current posture by asking
a series of questions that may have been partially relevant in the Kennedy era
but are irrelevant today. Here they are: Are the Kennedy assurances our credo
today? Are Americans committed to liberty? Can our friends rely on us? Do foes
have reason to fear us? What are we to do about those that profess friendship
but ingratiate themselves with our foes?
What this indicates
is that Clifford May and those of his ilk have a mindset rooted in a Cold War
that was a mistake to have been in the first place, and has vanished some time
ago in any case. It was Winston Churchill who first realized that Britain will never again be a superpower, and
that America
was destined to inherit the mantle. To make sure that Britain will continue to cohabit the mantle with
the newcomer, Churchill came up with the idea of warning the Americans about
the danger that the Soviet Union was posing. America
listened and the era of the Cold War was triggered.
As planned by Churchill , Britain
played the role of piloting America
through uncharted waters that were made dangerous not by the intent of the Soviet Union as falsely predicted by Churchill, but
because of the random incidents that materialized by the very fact the
Churchill Cold War was in progress. And so, Churchill turned out to be not a
prophet but a real life incarnation of Don Quixote. He got America to
battle enemies it thought were riskier than windmills but were not.
A decade or two
later, seeing how well the Churchill trick had worked for Britain , the self appointed Jewish
honchos decided to use the same trick to advance their own agenda. They told
the Americans that the Arab countries were dangerous, and that Israel was willing to play a role that will
protect America
not from the non-existent Arab armies but from a possible rise in the price of
oil. The song they sang continually was to the effect that Israel can help
lower the already cheap price of oil.
The honchos of World
Jewry added that in return for doing the work, Israel
will need money, weapons and diplomatic cover to get on with the business of
making the people of America
enjoy cheap oil for ever and ever. America
gave without restraint; Israel
took without shame but delivered nothing to America . It did, however, deliver a
great deal of heartache to the people of the region, a situation that forced
the Arabs to respond by jacking up the price of oil from 2.6 dollars a barrel
where it was to 28 dollars a barrel in a matter of months. And the price has
been going higher ever since.
Because history
never stops evolving, the Jewish players of the Churchill game found themselves
compelled to constantly update the nature of the threat they say the Arabs –
and later the Muslims – pose to America
and to the West. This brings us to the following passage in the May column:
“The ideologies most hostile to America
and the West have arisen in what we have come to call the Muslim world.” It was
a convenient shift because Islam was the nexus that allowed him to single out Iran – the
current preoccupation of the Jews – and write about it. And so he discussed the
Iran
nuclear program.
He went on to say
that these are the current real enemies of America . But he did not stop here.
Instead, he did something that shows how much he is gripped by the mentality of
a Cold War which used to place the nations of the world into one of two columns
“friends” or “foes.” Apparently baffled by what he sees happening today which
does not conform to that formula, he asks: “But what are we to make of those
nations that are not against us – but also are not with us?” He names Russia , Pakistan ,
Turkey , Saudi Arabia and Qatar .