The editors of the Wall Street Journal asked a question
which, if my Jewish friend were alive today, he would throw his hands up in the
air and shout: “light up the oven.” That was his way of saying that the self
appointed leaders of the Jews are paving the way for the incinerators to be lit
again to take in the Jews the way that they did in the 1940s. At times he would
express the same sentiment saying: this is handing every Jew a one way ticket
on the express train to the gas chamber. The man was old enough to remember
what happened in the past, and wise enough to know that if you repeat the
performance, the ending is likely to be the same.
So let's look at the infamous question that the editors have
asked: “Why would he [John Kerry] oppose having Congress make a certainty of
it?” The “it” refers to the Iranians knowing that if the negotiations fail, the
sanctions will be increased. All this came in the piece that the editors wrote
under the title: “Mood-Music Diplomacy on Iran ”
and the subtitle: “More sanctions would strengthen U.S.
leverage with Tehran .”
It was published in the Journal on December 13, 2013.
The subject discussed in the piece relate to John Kerry
telling the American lawmakers not to impose new sanctions on Iran
beforehand. Asked why not, Kerry replied that the Iranians know what will
happen if the negotiations fail. And it was against this backdrop that the
editors of the Wall Street Journal argued that the Congress should have the
opportunity to make sure of it.
What horrifies people about this Jewish method of operation
is that it robs the negotiating partner of having a face to face interlocutor.
Yes, there will be an American delegation sitting across the table mumbling
things on behalf of America ,
but that's all it will be – just a meaningless mumbling session. And this is
because those in Congress who will have written the legislation imposing new
sanctions will have the final say as to whether or not the negotiations have
failed. And they will determine where to go from here regardless of what was
agreed to.
Thus, throughout the negotiations, the Iranians will be
looking at the faces of puppets that may be negotiating in good faith or in bad
faith but without relevance one way or the other. The whole thing will look and
smell like a Jewish quackery of the worst kind. And what this means is that the
passing of legislation before the negotiations begin, is an act of Jewish bad
faith disguised as American negotiation in good faith. It is as repugnant as it
is revolting on its face.
Negotiating in a climate of unpredictability such as it is
proposed here has ramifications that go beyond the current negotiations. It
tells the world that the rule of law in America may apply to kids that rob
a store or drive in a drunken state, but do not apply when the Jewish
organizations subvert the American Constitution. It tells the world that the
Executive may have the constitutional power to navigate the ship of state
through foreign policy issues but the Jewish dominated Congress will rule by
statutes that are made to supersede the Constitution whenever the Jews decide
it is in their interest to do so.
What also seems to be above the Jewish mind to grasp is that
negotiations are usually done in stages requiring a change in approach. In this
case, they have been ongoing for many years with several stages that can be
grouped as the-before and the-after the interim deal. What must never be done
is maintain the same approach going from one stage to the next, yet this is
what the Jewish Representative from New
York , Eliot Engel is trying to do. This is how the
editors discussed it in their piece: “Mr. Engel wondered why the Administration
would oppose new sanctions … when it also takes credit for the existing sanctions.”
Stop wondering, Eliot. People jokey for position before a
deal is made. This means each side tries to fool the other as to what it will
accept and what it will not. This is legitimate bad faith. But once a deal is
struck, the real negotiations begin, and they better be conducted in good
faith. What Engel has demonstrated is what has been known about the Jews for
ages; these people negotiate in bad faith after they strike a deal the way they
do before it. They are incorrigible because this mentality is a product of
their religious belief.