Thursday, February 25, 2016

How not to resolve the Jewish Question

Have you ever read a piece of writing that was authored by a Jew, or heard a speech that was delivered by a Jew outlining: How to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict?

You never did because it never happened. But time after time, there have been proposals given out by Jews on “how NOT to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.” The newest such proposal is an article that came under such title and a subtitle that reads: “Some policies are guaranteed to make things worse.” It was written by Clifford D. May, and published on February 23, 2016 in The Washington Times.

Like all the articles and speeches in that vein, May's proposal shows convincingly there is not a single peaceful pathway that will lead to the resolution of that conflict because underlying it is a Jewish problem that has persisted for three and a half millenniums. Until this Jewish problem is resolved, the region will remain in turmoil. And sadly – very sadly – no Jewish inspired problem in the region or elsewhere on the planet has ever been resolved without a destructive event accompanying it; something that has always hurt a great many people.

Look what prompted Clifford May to write his article: “to make sure the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians does not get resolved … start with an idea the French have been floating: Convene a 'peace conference.'” Well, my friend, you need not be a psychiatrist to have noticed that the word association typifying the Jewish existence has always been “peacemaker” to which the reflexive Jewish response has been “crucify him”. 

But why would the French or anyone wish to convene a peace conference? Clifford May tells why. He says the French motive is to “demand that Israelis end the occupation [of Palestine].” It is obvious from that response that the French, like everyone else, see the occupation as a major source of friction in the region with ramifications that extend far and wide.

But occupation and the usurpation of neighboring properties by creeping annexation has been the cornerstone of the Jewish system of religious beliefs since the days of Moses. Their account of what they did (true or false) is that they killed the first born to every Egyptian family, looted their homes and temples, and ran into the desert looking for a land reputed to be full of milk and honey. That was Palestine, a place inhabited by peaceful people the Jews were able to surprise, kill mercilessly and rob the same way that common terrorists do their thing.

This is a story that the Jews say has unfolded three and a half millenniums ago. It is one they celebrate every year as Passover. It is also an event they replayed more or less the same way a century ago – not out of Egypt this time but out of Europe. That's when they had their eyes not only on the land of milk and honey but the wider Fertile Crescent of which Palestine is but a tiny spot on the map. What the Jews have been laboring to grab this time, are riches that extend from the sources of Nile River to the wetlands of the Euphrates River.

To articulate his point of view, Clifford May has done what the Jews always do. He pinned on others everything that's wrong with the Jews while attributing to the Jews the virtues he saw in others. This approach has always yielded the effect of turning history upside down. It also painted the human race as a species of jerks while making the Jews look like a group whose perfection is only exceeded by its idealism.

Thus, the story they tell about the 1967 war – for which they had prepared since the 1956 assault on the Suez Canal by France, Britain and Israel – is that the Arabs attacked Israel, and not the other way around. More wars were started by the Arabs in the decades that followed, they say, the result of which being that Israel occupied the Sinai, Gaza, the Golan Heights, Southern Lebanon and the West Bank of the Jordan River. Except for the West Bank, Israel is out of those places, say the Jews, not because it was kicked out but because it felt like it. After all, why does someone fight a war if not to catch a fish and throw it right back into the sea? They want you to believe they engage in wars not for keeps but as a sport activity that's uplifting of the spirit.

Because America is working like the devil to keep the Palestinians of the West Bank helpless and disarmed, the Jews are able to hang on to that piece of land like their dear life. To justify this ongoing crime against humanity, they have – for half a century – been portraying the Palestinians as a cut from the cloth making up the rest of humanity. Meanwhile, the Jews are portraying themselves as standing alone like paragons of what's perfect and what's ideal.

That's how Clifford May explains why most of the world stands with the Palestinians against Israel. But he is a Jewish leader whose job is to reassure the rank and file that everything will be okay if they continue to believe in the cause of Zionism and remain in the fold. And so he elaborates as follows:

“There are those who understand how anti-Israelism and anti-Semitism have become intertwined. Just as the goal of radical anti-Semitism in the 20th century was a Europe without Jews, the goal of radical anti-Semitism in the 21st century is a Middle East without a Jewish state. In both cases, economic warfare and propaganda are means to that end.”

Thus, speaking of the movement known as Boycott, Divest and Sanction (BDS), he tells the Jewish rank and file that help is on the way:

“A growing list of members of Congress [has] begun to enact legislation intended to discourage anti-Israeli trade and commerce practices … authorizing the U.S. to re-evaluate economic relations with the EU countries that support boycotting Israel … Illinois and South Carolina have passed laws penalizing companies that discriminate against Israel. Similar measures are pending in other states … Anti-BDS bills or resolutions have passed in Canada, France, Spain and Britain”.

What's this about? In practical commercial terms, such measures – even when they are fully enacted and rigorously policed – yield absolutely nothing because you cannot force people to buy what they choose not to consume. The measures will, however, have a powerful psychological effect.

This is how it works. Recall that Clifford May spoke of anti-Israelism and anti-Semitism as if they were genetic defects afflicting the human species. The truth, however, is that they are acquired conditions brought about by the Jewish leaders themselves.

They happen when those honchos sense they are losing power and/or wealth. To get their status back in shape, they employ shady practices such as the bribe and the blackmail to force the leaders of a country to adopt measures designed to advance the Jewish causes. But such measures often prove to be detrimental to the population at large. In time, a critical mass of harmful effects is reached, anger mounts among ordinary people, and anti-Semitism erupts. If not dealt with properly, pogrom is unleashed.

This has been the history of the Jews since the beginning of time. It is what Clifford May and all those like him are trying to replicate yet again. And this is why the Jewish question never gets resolved.