Do you remember what happened after the Iran nuclear
deal was signed, sealed and delivered? The Jewish saboteurs and their echo
repeaters continued their attacks on it. They worked like busy bees trying to
convince the American Congress of the brain-dead it must find a way to blow up
that thing before it takes effect.
Those who know do realize that this method of interacting
with others is as Jewish as matzoh bread. In fact, not only do the Jews advise
such course of action to the people who listen to them; it is how they proceed
themselves after negotiating a deal with someone. And no one knows this reality
better than the Palestinians who have tried to negotiate a peace deal with
them. Time after time, the Palestinians saw the deal they spent years
negotiating being blown up by the Israelis who never failed to inject the kind
of last minute condition that exploded like a hand grenade under the
negotiating table.
Here they come again, trying to sabotage the Syrian peace
talks slated to begin soon. Here comes the icon of Jewish trickery ... the one
in many, Elliott Abrams, doing his thing in an attempt to blow up the talks
even before the first session is held. To this end, he wrote “Syria Delusions,
Round Two,” an article he posted on the website of the Council on Foreign
Relations on February 24, 2016.
To do that, Abrams looks back in time searching for straws
on which to base an argument that will help blow up the talks. He goes back to
the year 2012 when Hillary Clinton, Leon Panetta and David Petraeus had “urged
President Obama to support the Syrian rebels.” He also goes back to the year
2014 when Hillary Clinton had remarked that the “failure to build a force of
the people protest[ing] against Assad, left a vacuum that the jihadis have now
filled.”
The author uses those examples to make the point that
President Obama made a mistake when he rejected the advice that was given to
him in the past. This said, he warns that the President is repeating the same
mistake by rejecting the advice given to him now by the likes of Ash Carter,
Joseph Dunford and John Brennan who want to “inflict real pain on the Russians”
rather than sit with them in a peace conference on Syria .
But how is it morally justifiable to seek inflicting pain on
the Russians at this time rather than seek to alleviate the horrible pain which
millions of Syrian civilians are suffering and have been for five years? Elliot
Abrams answers this question by repeating the logic that was articulated in the
Wall Street Journal. It goes as follows:
[The Russians claimed military cooperation between the U.S. and Russia even though Ash Carter had
explicitly ruled out such thing. The thinking is that Russia is trying to drive a wedge between the U.S. and its coalition partners by giving the
appearance that Washington
would accept Mr. Assad. Furthermore, while all this was happening, Russia 's warplanes were stepping up their
attacks in Syria ].
But is that enough of an excuse to let the Syrians die by
the hundreds of thousands and suffer by the millions? No, says John Kerry who
is the American Secretary of State. In fact, he added that the peace talks have
“a viable chance of succeeding,” in which case the misery will be alleviate and
gradually lifted. In contrast, says the Wall Street Journal, according to
Elliott Abrams, it is that “an [unnamed] senior administration official” had
reported that Mr. Carter had said “he thinks it's a [Russian] ruse.”
And based on that hearsay of a hearsay of a hearsay, Elliot
Abrams concludes that “Mr. Obama has an absolute right to reject the advice he
got [in 2012] being commander in chief ... and be attuned instead to Mr.
Kerry's view that talks with Sergei Lavrov will solve Syria.”
However, says Elliott Abrams, this is not going to happen
because Obama rejected the advice he received in 2012, and because Fred Hof,
who was Mr. Obama's Special Adviser for Syria, said that “during all of the
years of the Assad regime, the United States failed to protect a single Syrian
inside Syria.”
For these reasons,
says Elliott Abrams, it is better not to have a peace conference on Syria . The
option he prefers is the one that was hinted at by the Wall Street Journal.
It is to confront
the Russians on the battlefield because peace has the effect of killing people
whereas war has a proven record of saving lives.