Tuesday, February 16, 2016

The Meaning of a Piece that's pointless

Read the news-item/opinion-piece that was put out by the Associated Press (AP), and was carried by several publications, among them the New York Times (NYT) which published the thing under the title: “Amid Multitude of Woes, Egypt's Leader Says Democracy Is Back,” on February 13, 2016.

Being a news agency, the AP is supposed to only gather news and purvey it – which it does most of the time – except when the item which it carries is related to Egypt (at times another Arab or Muslim country.) This happens because the English speaking information outlets were designed by the Jewish hate and incitement machine in such a way as never to think or say something that's not derogatory about those countries.

This is why you begin with a headline that does not say: “Egypt's Leader Says Democracy Is Back” but one that opines: “Amid Multitude of Woes...” The pertinent news item then appears in the first paragraph of the article, not as a stand alone item, but one that's joined by the infamous Jewish signature BUT, to then go on and say “but rights groups say he [el-Sisi] has presided over a crackdown on dissent.” And that sets the tone for the way that the rest of the article is handled. In one word: it is abominable.

They say that President el-Sisi gave a speech in a parliament chamber that was “packed with his supporters,” and they begin the next paragraph in such a way as to tie the current condition with “practices reminiscent of Egypt's past autocratic regimes.” If you want to know what it is that's stirring the bile of the journalists who sired the news/editorial hybrid, they don't let you down. They tell you it is that: “state television labeled the speech 'historic' before it started”. What happened there? Did they get an advance copy of the speech?

Worse, “some lawmakers [put on] a show of patriotism," say the writers of the article. Other lawmakers shouted to the President 'We love you.'” Imagine! How much worse can those Egyptians get? What? Are you talking to me? Do you really want to know how much worse those Egyptians can get? Let me tell you how much worse. Here, take this: “When the speech was later interrupted by the same chant, he replied: 'I love you too.'” Whoa! What's wrong with these people? Are they having a lovefest or something? Why can they not hate their President the way that the Congress of America hates Obama?

Perhaps what's wrong with all this, is the fact that el-Sisi himself has acknowledged “the country is still struggling to rebuild its economy and combat extremism.” However, undaunted by any of it, he went on to declare that the country “succeeded in restoring representative government,” then added: “From this place, the Egyptian people declare to the world they have laid the foundation of a democratic system and rebuilt constitutional institutions.”

Is this why the man is proud of his accomplishments? Does he not know that the dictatorship of Zion is more valuable than the instructions given to him by a democratic mob? He should be surrounding himself with Jewish advisers to tell him what to do, not listen to the voice of his people. What kind of a leader is he?

If, despite all this, you still think that Sisi's stuff is great stuff, wait till you see what the AP/NYT journalists say about it. Are you ready? Here it comes: “the speech largely consisted of generalities and was repeatedly interrupted by applause.” So what! you exclaim; most speeches are full of generalities. No, no, no, protest the Anglophile journalists of America, it's not the generalities that are irritating; it's the applause, stupid. Applause?

You ask: What's wrong with the applause? And they tell you to look closely who the Egyptians were applauding; it was their own president, they say. Well, who else should it be, you ask? And they scream at you: Look what happens in America, you idiot. There is only one soul deserving of 29 standing ovations. He comes to his private WC, a Witless Congress that is a place where the walls are full of anti-Obama graffiti, and where Netanyahu gets applauded. That's how the whole world is meant to function … and will someday.

And look. Look what's happening in Egypt, they tell you. Do you know what that is? Listen to angry journalists tell you about police brutality in that country. Can you believe what the police do in Egypt? They don't do the good stuff that's done in America:

They don't pump dozens of bullets in the back of an aging man that's running away from them. They don't kill a twelve year old boy because someone telephoned to say he was playing with a toy gun in the park. And they don't shove an innocent man in their van so hard, they break his collar bone and let him die as he cries out for medical attention.

No, they don't do any of that in Egypt. Instead, they allegedly beat up two doctors. It's only an allegation … and it's not that they killed someone, but that they beat up two individuals. How much more brutal can they get?

Instead of giving a speech about police brutality – complain the Anglophile journalists – Sisi has given one that was full of generalities. And their bile has started churning in their stomachs.