Saturday, September 10, 2016

New Readings on their Design for America

First, there was Clifford May who went to Israel and was instructed on how to take to America the message of dividing the ethno-religious groups. This done, work was to begin on splitting that nation into a Judeo-Christian camp that will be favored, and a camp for everyone else that will be relegated to second class citizenship.

Second, there was Benny Avni who also went to Israel and was instructed on how to take to America the message of acquitting Netanyahu of his shortcomings, and blaming them on both the Palestinian and American Presidents. All of that and other things were to be done in furtherance of the Jewish grand design to organize the world and make it safe for Jews. The unending desire is to refashion the world in such a way that the Jews will be able to live like Jews anywhere they go without being subjected to antisemitic hatred no matter how much and how often they urinate on everyone else's lawn.

And now, there are two more indications as to what the Jews have up their sleeve for America. Both indications appeared on September 8, 2016, and both were published in the Wall Street Journal. One came under the title: “Remember Iran's Role in 9/11” and the subtitle: “Forgetful officials should not be rewarding Tehran for its deadly actions with gifts like sanctions relief.” It was written by Joseph I. Lieberman. The other came in the form of an editorial written by the editors of the Journal under the title: “Pleading With Putin on Syria” and the subtitle: “The Kremlin's main goal is to get Ukraine sanctions lifted”.

To visualize what these people have created, you'll have to imagine a creature that's equipped with one head and two faces. One face looks left; the other looks right and neither can see ahead or behind. The creature is going nowhere because the faces can never agree on what constitutes the way forward.

Look how the editors of the Journal have managed to put together that creature. After laying out the historical facts as they see them, they ended the editorial with these words: “The political solution the Syrian people need most is a new Administration in Washington.” Here is what's questionable about this idea:

It is that there are two candidates from which the American voters will choose one to be their President and the head of the country's administration. One candidate represents the Journal's favorite Republican Party, but he happens not revile Putin's Russia as much as they do. The other candidate represents the Democratic Party which they detest, but she happens to dislike Putin's Russia as much as they do. This raises the question: Which of the two candidates are the editors suggesting will be good for the Syrian people? And which are they recommending should be voted into office?

The editors are not answering those questions because they do not worry about any of the implied considerations. These are matters pertaining to American foreign policy, whereas they are Jewish editors whose interest is Israel, always Israel, and no one but Israel. As far as they are concerned: “Obama has little leverage and less credibility,” whereas “Russia has created military facts on the ground.” And that's what is telling them how they should treat America to better serve the interests of Israel.

The bottom line is that they cannot wait to see Obama gone because he always put America's interests above those of Israel. They hope that the next administration – no matter of which stripe it will be – will go back to the business of sacrificing America's interests in fulfillment of the ambitions that the Jews have for Israel … and more.

As to Joseph Lieberman, he tells what is meant by 'more.' After telling a history of Iran that was written by the most skilled mutilators of history, he laments: “Washington policy makers have pursued closer relations with Tehran … the U.S. led the countries known as the P5+1 in making a deal with Iran – giving them billions of dollars [in sanctions relief]”.

And so, he recommends the following: “The U.S. should not be rewarding Iran with sanctions relief, and the easing of arms embargoes and ballistic-missile restrictions.” He says that much because Iran is one of the Middle Eastern societies that will not allow the Jews to implement their grand design for the region.

This is why Lieberman wants America to prepare itself to weaken Iran, even if the process will also weaken America … perhaps strengthen Iran even more rather than weaken it.