If you follow what the Jewish pundits are saying and writing
these days, you'll get the same feeling as if you were eavesdropping on the
get-together of a street gang specializing in theft, gang-rape and murder. The Jews
seem to forget that what they publish on the electronic and print media does
not circulate among them only but goes out to the general public.
How else should we interpret the lamentations of a prominent
Jewish leader who publicly whines that President Obama failed to provide
Iranian dissidents “with communications, money, and even arms”? These are not
dissidents whose land is occupied by a foreign military that peppered the
landscape with checkpoints; they are reckless youngsters who called for the death
of their head of state and also shouted: “President Obama, are you with us or
against us?” How would you feel if a foreign leader provided communications,
money and arms to groups that protest one thing or another in America , and
call for the death of the President?
You may also try to imagine something like that happening in
occupied Palestine .
What do you think a Jewish pundit like Clifford D. May would have written to
describe what's imposed on the Jewish settlers? When you have imagined all
that, read what Clifford May actually wrote about the Iran situation
and be amazed. It came in an article under the title: “Iran and the future of the Middle
East ” and the subtitle: “Obama's bet on the Islamic republic
moderating is a long-shot.” It was published on August 30, 2016 in The
Washington Times.
The occasion that prompted our author to decide on writing
his article is a new book that describes “the opportunities Mr. Obama missed –
or, more precisely, dismissed,” says May. What he saw in the book, which
strikes him, is that President Obama refused to back the Iranian dissidents and
went further by ordering the CIA to turn its back on their movement. Moreover,
Mr. Obama turned his back on imposing new sanctions on Iran , or even
tightening the old ones, says May.
And neither is he satisfied with the explanation that
Secretary of State John Kerry gave to justify the measures taken by the
administration. He did not see the merit in Kerry’s saying: “Many wars have
been fought over misunderstandings, misinterpretations and lack of effective
diplomacy … War is the failure of diplomacy.” In response, May quipped “I
suspect Clausewitz and Sun Tzu would beg to differ,” whomever they are.
But these are not the only characters whose views Clifford
May seems to like. He mentions the names of six members of Congress who believe
that when you deal with Iran 's
rulers, talking softly is not enough. May also likes the idea that
“congressional staffers partnered with several think tanks to find new ways to
squeeze Iran 's
oil profits and ability to conduct financial transactions”.
He takes pride in the fact that one of those tanks is that
which goes by the comical name, Foundation for Defense of Democracies – his own
creation. He says the outfit came up with a “financial bomb,” an American
dominated clearing house that uses the SWIFT software. Its function is to
facilitate financial transactions between different jurisdictions. He explains:
“The Obama administration opposed expelling Iran
from SWIFT but Congress overrode the White House and de-SWIFTed Tehran ”.
What Clifford May did not explain is that the move turned
out to be another “financial bomb”; one that began the process of eroding America 's
financial supremacy in the world. It was this act, more than anything else that
prompted the major banks of the world – including the Japanese – to subscribe
to the new China-based SWIFT.
Yes, the process of eroding America 's financial supremacy has
finally begun thanks to the Jewish clowns who perform at the Foundation for Defense
of Democracies. They entertained the dodo birds of the Congress, and got the
members to lay eggs like a perpetual goof machine.
When a street gang behaves in that manner, we call its
actions: theft, gang-rape and murder. When the Congress of a major power
behaves in that manner, we call it an act of war. However, because America is a
superpower, no one will risk confronting it directly.