You might have noticed, every Jew and his sidekick these
days are talking about the hell that is the war in Syria .
In fact, what is happening in Syria
at this time is but a continuation of what happened in Iraq in 2003,
and continues to unfold to this day. It all started when the Jewish
conspirators – headquartered in Israel
and working with their comrades in George W. Bush's America – concocted a scheme by
which to deceive the “Western” intelligence agencies.
Intending to mobilize the American military and prepare it
to go into action in furtherance of the Judeo-Israeli plan to implement a
Jewish Pax Americana in the Middle Eastern region, the deceiving conspirators
faked the evidence that gave the appearance Iraq was producing weapons of mass
destruction.
Upon learning of that scheme, Mr. Amr Moussa who was the
secretary general of the Arab League at the time, warned that if America attacked Iraq “this will open the gates of
hell.” Well, if we go by what the Jews and their sidekicks are saying now, the
gates of hell have opened as predicted.
So how are the Jews responding to what they witness in Syria today?
Well, you can see for yourself by going over one response that came in the form
of an article printed under the title: “The sorrow and the pity in Syria ” and the subtitle: “Iran intends to
incorporate the brutalized Arab land into its vision of a caliphate.” It was
written by Clifford D. May and published on December 20, 2016 in The Washington
Times.
In order to disparage President Obama's refusal to add fuel
to the fire – potentially escalating the Syrian war – Clifford May belittles
the words that were uttered by the President as he explained his handling of
the war. May went on to describe how hellish life must be for the Syrian people
who endure the hell they are living. Now, my friend, try to guess what May's
own words sound like. Let me tell you, they sound like those uttered in 2003
when America attacked Iraq and
destroyed it in response to Jewish desires.
Here are those famous words: “thousands dead, millions
displaced, millions more living in fear, sorrow and pitiful poverty.” The
difference between then and now is that in 2003 the words were uttered by real
human beings who empathized with the pain of other human beings. This contrasts
with today's fake sympathy expressed by Jewish quacks who pretend to feel the
pain of Arabs, but in reality savor their tortured fate.
You know someone is a fake and a quack when he tells you the
truth about something that is no more whereas he spent a lifetime lying about
it when it was at the height of its splendor. You must be asking: What the hell
is he talking about? Well, let me show you what I mean. Look at this passage:
“Inferno has been on display in Aleppo , an
ancient city, once among the most diverse and dynamic in the Middle
East ”.
Did you ever catch Clifford May or any Jew say something as
flattering as this about Aleppo
or any Arab city or anything Arab? Never. These people spend a lifetime
disparaging those they hate and everything that belongs to them. They maintain
the hate till the latter succumb to a calamity, at which time the Jew will say
what was annihilated had been great while it lasted.
Now that you know you're dealing with a fake and a quack,
you take what he says with a grain of salt. For example, he says this: “In the Middle East , the law of the jungle trumps international
law every time”.
Yes, it is true that the law is trumped in the Middle East … but not every time. It is trumped by Israel every time because Israel is protected by America every
time it tramples on the law. But everyone else in the region respects the law
and wishes that both America
and Israel
got civilized enough to blend in the places where civilization and the Code of
Hammurabi had their roots.
One more piece of quackery from our Jewish writer, and every
Jew like him. It must be said that everyone who runs to be president does so
because he has a vision for his country. When elected, he does his utmost to
implement the vision. If he succeeds, his vision becomes the legacy that
outlives him … it will be his legacy.
For this reason, no one that is civilized faults a president
for hanging on to his vision-cum-legacy. No President that is, except Barack
Obama whose legacy turned out to be incompatible with the Jewish Pax Americana.
And so they used it against him with utmost savagery, something like a zillion
times a zillion.
Here is one version of that sort of savage behavior: “Were
he [Obama] to take action, Iran 's
envoys might walk away from negotiating the nuclear deal Obama envisioned as
his legacy”.