In the civil war that has erupted between liberal Jews and
the neocons who broke off from their movement, valuable information and ideas
are often exchanged between the parties.
The sad part is that such information and ideas are not
allowed to become raw material for use by non-Jewish historians. This must be
reversed because such people need them to write unbiased, authentic and
non-mutilated history. That's not what's happening in Europe ,
however, where non-Jews are thrown in jail for probing the history surrounding
the Holocaust. It is not what's happening in North America
either because the suppression of free speech on this continent has reached the
point of ruining the lives and careers of the non-Jews who dare to dabble in
Jewish history.
To see how dense the information and ideas are – hence how
valuable they can be to non-Jewish historians – the reader may wish to consult
an article that came under the title: “Liberal Zionism in the Age of Trump,”
written by Omri Boehm and published on December 20, 2016 in the New York Times.
This article is an example of the skirmishes that erupt from
time to time between the two Jewish factions. In this case, Boehm who is of the
neocon stripes, uses the result of the latest developments on the American
political scene, to tell the liberals that their days are numbered. To make his
point, Boehm unpacks and parses many of the historical events that would be
taboo to non-Jews. One glaring example comes out forcefully in the following
condensed passage:
“Such alliances may be traced to 1941. In a letter to Nazi
officials, drafted by Avraham Stern, a leading Zionist and member of Irgun and
Lehi, Stern proposes to collaborate with Hitler on solving the Jewish question
by achieving a Jewish free Europe … He suggests collaborating with the German's
war effort and establish a Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis,
which will be bound by treaty with the German Reich”.
Now, my friend, think what a non-Jewish historian could do
with the information contained in that passage. Think also of the numerous
times that the Jewish pundits incited the ignoramuses in the American Congress,
instructing and conditioning them to believe that 350 million contemporary
Arabs are horrible people because decades ago, an Arab Mufti traveled to
Germany and spoke with Hitler. Think of the consequences that flow from America 's
legislators drinking from this cup of Jewish evil and acting on it as if there
was but one side to every story, the Jewish side.
Having done all that thinking, ask yourself why it is that
the Jews insist on maintaining their monopoly on the information pertaining to
their history. They use such information all the time to engage in family feuds
but scream their heads off when a non-Jew uses the same information to explain
the unfolding of history in a way that may not suit their narrative. Why do
they do this?
Well, if you probe deeply into the subject, you'll come to a
startling conclusion. You'll realize that the Jews – be they liberal or neocon
– believe that the world was created to be the stage on which Jewish history is
unfolding. They see their history as being the main plot telling the story of
creation, and see everything else as the subplots that add sizzle to their
narrative. Thus, in their eyes, the Old Testament is not where religion and
history begin and end, it is where they begin; from where they continue to
unfold to this day, and will unfold to the end of time.
Of course, the Old Testament is not written in the format
that regular historians use to write regular history. But given that the Jews
who call themselves historians, write stories as a continuation of the Old
Testament, what they create never coincides with reality. Instead, they write
in a style that is compatible with the format used by the Old Testament. The
Jews do this so that their writing may be added to that Testament at some point
in the future, and blend harmoniously with the existing stories.
Before this happens, however, the stories must be koshered
into a vanilla state so that they appear to be the work of God. That's why you
see the Jews rewrite the history of Anne Frank, for example, having removed the
reality that she was betrayed by people who told the Nazis about her hideout.