Based on the belief that John Bolton is a multilateralist,
Benny Avni has constructed a theory around the idea that the philosophy of his
new hero coincides with that of the New-York/Tel-Aviv axis that's trying to
assemble a hate-the-world syndicate; one that's ready and willing to set the
world on fire and rebuild it from scratch.
The poor fellow must have been asleep when Bolton was
flashing his true colors, as he did in several talking-head appearances and in
op-ed pieces … arguing for the breakup of every political and economic grouping
in the world and for the establishment of a one-to-one relationship between
America and each of the resulting pieces. To that end, Bolton lobbied hard for Britain 's exit from the European Union and got
his wish, except that the British voters have indicated they may reverse
themselves and decide to stay in the Union, an occurrence that will most
certainly disappoint Bolton .
Benny Avni revealed the details of his fantasy in the column
he wrote under the title: “In response to Putin, Team Trump is going
'multilateral' without the United Nations,” published on March 26, 2018 in the
New York Post.
The following is how Avni celebrated what he mistook as a
success achieved by those for whom he is rooting: “The coordinated
Euro-American action against Russia
may signal the end of an era: hello coalitions of the willing.” As to you dear
reader, note the “s” at the end of the word “coalition” because it signals the
author's desire to see the formation of more than one coalition in the future.
After the fake celebration, Benny Avni literally welcomed
John Bolton to the post of national security adviser in the Trump
administration, and did something that is as Jewish as matzoh bread: he stole
the success that was scored by A and attributed it to B. More specifically, he
attributed to America the
call to punish Russia ; a
request that was made by the Prime Minister of Britain who called on friends to
show their displeasure at Russia 's
unacceptable activities on British soil.
Not only did Avni commit a typically Jewish act of
intellectual dishonesty, he went further and created the noise that made the
whole drama sound like it was a John Bolton success story. Here is how Benny
Avni did that: “Caricatures of his 'unilateralism' aside, Bolton is a proponent
of coordinated action among allies, like the bright display of solidarity with Britain .” What
Avni failed to mention is that the incident and the drama that followed it had
unfolded entirely before John Bolton was heard from, and before he was
nominated to the post of National Security Adviser.
So the question that needs to be answered is this: “What
kind of “coalitions of the willing” does Benny Avni fantasize about, having
said, “Goodbye, empty UN blather”? The only way we can answer this question is
to review how the United
States handled such matters in the past. To
confront the North Koreans in the 1950s, America called on the United
Nations to help, and the UN responded positively. The operation was
inconclusive. A decade later, the United States called on the NATO
allies to help in the Vietnam War, and many responded positively. But when they
saw the futility of the war, they jumped ship … one after the other.
When Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait ,
it was Saudi Arabia that
called on America to join
the Arab coalition to oust him, and America joined what came to be
known as the First Gulf War. It must be said that it was the only coalition of
the willing in which the goals set for it were achieved. This operation was
followed by the Second Gulf War; an ill-advised criminal enterprise planned for
and executed by the Jews using America 's
military and treasury. At first, a number of NATO countries joined the
Judeo-American coalition, but they quickly withdrew when they saw the futility
of it all. The historical record up to now makes clear that this operation will
continue to be viewed as the worst mistake America ever committed.
Based on that history, it is reasonable to surmise that when
it comes to serious conflicts, America
will have no one willing to join it ever again. What may happen, however, is
that America
could find itself in a coalition called for by the UN. This would be the same
UN about which Benny Avni said this: “Goodbye, empty UN blather,” and John
Bolton said this: “No one would care if the UN headquarters in New York lost 10 of its
38 floors”.
Speaking about blather, Benny Avni gave his version of how
“coalitions of the willing” have evolved. Look what he says, and see if you can
make sense of it: “While 'coalition of the willing' was first used by Bill
Clinton, it was made popular by George W. Bush, and was much maligned after the
Iraq
war, when the United Nations was put at the center of international action. It
didn't work. Russia , China , North Korea ,
Iran
and various Islamist regimes became more aggressive than ever”.