Whereas the paradigm governing America's conduct in the past
had been to root for people around the globe that wish to govern themselves and
do business as they please; it is no longer the case even if the claim persists
that the paradigm has not changed.
The truth, however, is that America has adopted a more complex
paradigm. It is one that seeks to project the glowing image of olden days while
pursuing an agenda that is little different from the goals of colonial empires
in a bygone era. This reality is detected in the fact that America engages
in two discourses at the same time. What's more; the discourses often run
against each other, at times even negate each other.
And so, it happens that when speaking in the abstract about
the things that America
stands for, the past is recalled and the values that were pursued then are
claimed to apply today. But when concrete actions are described – whether they
are ongoing or they are contemplated – the dreadful reality of what America has
become is revealed for all to see.
This performance unmasks America as being gripped by
schizophrenia, which is the reality of the current situation. In fact, America 's dual
profile consists of the old-time “nativists” who wish to “take back the
country” and return it to the glory days of the past. It also consists of the
much louder group of Jewish infiltrators who now command a good part of the
levers of governance. They seek to take the country back – not to the glorious
past of America
– but the inglorious past of yesterday's colonial powers.
One such voice is Rachel Avraham who wrote: “Why America must help the Kurds in Syria ,” an
article that was published on March 21, 2018 in The Washington Times. When
reading the article, if you think of Rachel Avraham as the Jew that's promoting
the Israeli agenda, you'll detect the usual Jewish badmouthing of the people
whom the Jews have designated enemies of the day. But if you think of Rachel
Avraham as an American, you'll be struck by the depth of her schizophrenia.
Here is a sampling of what she says as a Jew that's speaking
about the enemy:
“Turkey
and its Syrian allies have committed atrocities against the Kurdish people. Turkey has
bombed schools, hospitals, bakeries and water stations. Most of the victims of Turkey 's
assault are innocent Kurdish women and children … They committed human rights
abuses in Afrin. They looted civilian homes and stolen cars”.
And here is a sampling of what she says as a Jewish-American
that's gripped by schizophrenia:
“Turkey 's
Islamist allies are poised to ethnically cleanse the Kurds, and in the process,
eliminate America 's foothold
in Syria .
Although Russia , Turkey , ISIS and Iran
disagree on many things, they all agree on booting America out of the region. This
reality represents danger to the United States ,
its Middle Eastern allies, Europe and the
world at large. They also seek to prevent the creation of an independent Kurdistan , thus killing off the Kurds' dreams and
aspirations. The Kurdistan National Assembly of Syria is an umbrella
organization of Kurdish organizations that are pro-American. America should
use its influence in order to pressure Mr. Erdogan to hand over Afrin to the
Kurdistan National Assembly of Syria. America has a moral obligation to
help the Kurds”.
It is clear that one of Avraham's schizophrenic sides motivates
her to warn that Turkey has
joined Russia , ISIS and Iran in the effort to boot America out of the region, claiming that this
will endanger not only America
but also its allies and the world. As to her other schizophrenic side; it
motivates her to push for the creation of a Kurdistan that would be a clone of Israel and
allied with it. A feat such as this would go a long way toward the breaking of
the Arab world into cantons; a cherished Judeo-Israeli dream.
To reconcile the wishes of her Jewish side and the pretense
of being loyal to America, Rachel Avraham has managed to pull off a contrived
denouement of the kind used by drama writers to give a piece that's too heavy
on drama the semblance of a happy ending … or at least the suggestion that
things aren't as bad as they seem. Here is what Avraham did:
“ISIS will never be eradicated from Syria without boots on the ground and if America does not want to provide those boots,
then they need to help those who have been acting as America 's boots on the ground in
order to maintain the gains that they have won”.