How do you like the idea of the wolf inciting the
shepherd to go on a wild goose chase? What would you say if this happens, and
the wolf feasts on the sheep in the absence of their owner?
Like it or not, this is what the Jews are doing at
this time, inciting the simple-minded Americans to go around the globe looking
for Christians to liberate when there are no Christians that need liberating,
and certainly not by the clumsy Americans who might even be commanded by the
devilish Jews.
Meanwhile, those same Jews are busy in America,
reviving the old idea of suffocating the Christian principles of forgiveness
and peaceful coexistence. They do just that because those principles frustrate
their efforts to turn the country's children into a Pax Americana of gladiators
who would invade the world and try to make it safe for Jews. In fact, the
gladiators are always drafted to do this kind of missions despite the Jewish
obnoxious impulses that human beings find repelling, and compelled to turn
against the Jews.
You'll encounter one such wolf, engaged in that sort
of attempt when you read the article that came under the title: “The war
against Christians,” and the subtitle: “It hit a peak in the last century but
it's ongoing in the Middle East, Africa and Asia.” The article was written by
Clifford D. May, and published on December 24, 2019 in The Washington Times.
What the writer has done in essence, is advise his
readers that he has a contemporary story of Christian persecution to tell them
about. But he'll begin with something that happened a little more than a
hundred years ago. It is a story that was told a million times already, because
it covers the events that have led to World War One, the crumbling of the
Ottoman Empire, and the agreement among the colonial powers to break the
nations of the Middle East, and reshape them in a manner that suited their
colonial ambitions.
The reason why Clifford May wanted to retell this
story, is that according to him, two so-called “Israeli” Jews claim to have
found “incontrovertible” proof that Turkey committed genocide in the 1915-16
period. Clifford May does not tell what exactly they discovered that wasn't
known before, but he quotes them as having concluded that: “there was a factor,
one politically incorrect to discuss: As an ethos and ideology, Islam played a
cardinal role throughout the process, in each of its stages”.
Having said that, the two Israelis quickly backtracked
and made the following points:
“We're not arguing that Islam is worse than other
religious dogmas. It has various streams, and individual Muslims feel
differently about questions of practice, scriptural interpretation, and moral
behavior. Inherent in Islam are humanistic and moderate traditions … and
Christians lived in security under Ottoman rule for centuries. Indeed, their
stand was more secure than that of Jews or Muslims under Christian governments
during the same centuries”.
Believe it or not, all that was just a preamble that
nevertheless took more than half the article's space to flesh out. Even though
it unveiled nothing that is earth shaking, and despite the fact that the two
Israeli historians did not find cause to demonize the Muslims, Clifford May
went on to opine the following: “More important is to recognize that the war
against Christians didn't end in the last century. It continues to this day in
the Middle East, Asia and Africa … The de-Christianization of Syria, Iraq, Gaza
and the West Bank is well underway.” And that was meant to be an indirect
attack on the Muslims.
Clifford May also quoted the likes of Nina Shea whom
he called “a religious freedom expert” despite the fact that she and the Hudson
Institute out of which she operates, were instrumental in inspiring the likes
of Bret Stephens, when he was with the Wall Street Journal, to make the
proclamation that Egypt was being emptied of its Christians who were fleeing to
the United States in droves. This claim turned out to be a lie as big as the
credibility of Bret Stephens is small. Clifford May also quoted Bernard-Henri
Levy who was instrumental in causing the Holocaust that the Libyan people
continue to suffer to this day. Levy is now going after other countries in
Africa because he is again thirsting for African blood.
But why is Clifford May doing all this? His is doing
it because it is his contribution to the Jewish effort that aims to maintain
America in a continuous state of war. This is important to the Jews because
their plan is to prevent America from moving into a lethargic mode. They fear
that America might get used to the idea that peaceful living is more rewarding
than doing war all the time somewhere on the planet.
And so, in the same way that the Jews talk openly
about the religious and ethnic divisions that can be taken advantage of in
Iran, and bring about a regime change in that country, they talk about the
religious divisions that exist in the Arab and Muslim worlds. They hope that
the locals will hear them, and come to believe that America will reward them if
they start a religious uprising against their governments and topple them.
Clifford May, Nina Shea, Bret Stephens, Bernard-Henri
Levy and all those like them are in this together. They are conspiring in the
most subtle of ways to bring chaos and destruction to the Arab and Muslim
worlds so that the Jews may move in and take over from where the colonial
powers left off.