Can
a three-year-old toddler insult the intelligence of his mother? Well, consider
this scene: A mother walks into the room. She sees the open jar of candy on the
floor with candy strewn all over the place. She turns to her three-year-old
child and says: look what you did?
The
child says he didn't do it. The mother reminds him that no one was in the room
but him. He protests that the jar fell to the floor all by itself. And being an
inventive little thing, he goes further and tells his mother he even tried to
stop the jar from falling, but it fell down anyway all by itself.
So,
let me ask you these questions, my friend: Did the child mean to insult the
intelligence of his mother? Or did he think there was some truth to his story?
Whatever
your answer, if you think that a scene like the above can only happen when
children are involved, I advise you to think again. Meanwhile, you'll do well
to check on what the Jewish propagandists are saying to the
politico-journalistic crowd in the Washington Beltway, and how the crowd is
responding to the propaganda. A recent example to study came under the title:
“Truth-Telling to Advance Peace,” written by David M. Weinberg, and published
on November 29, 2019 in the Jewish publication Algemeiner.
Having
falsely accused the Palestinians of rejecting the idea of making peace with the
Jews, here is what else David Weinberg and those like him are telling the
Beltway crowd that's responsible for the continued occupation of Palestine,
which it does by arming and financing the Jews of Israel:
“The Trump moves were designed to reset the Mideast diplomatic
stage in a way that will advance the peace process. This means dialing down
Palestinian expectations. The Palestinian leadership must be disabused of the
notion that it can coerce Israel by appealing to international courts and
tribunals. The canard that settlements are illegal, or a war crime, has been a
key part of this Palestinian offensive. Applying the epithet 'illegal' makes a
peace deal less likely. The longer the Palestinians adhere to an obstructionist
policy, the less statehood they will get. Netanyahu said that Jews are not
foreign colonialists in Judea and Samaria. Moshe Ta'alon said that one cannot be
an occupant in his own land. 100 percent of the West Bank belongs to Israel.
Israel will insist on maintaining control of the Jordan Valley and a very broad
Jerusalem envelope”.
So,
here is David Weinberg the Jew telling the American lawmakers and the executives
in charge of enforcing those laws, that the laws they made together with the
international community are not understood by that community. What he says
implicitly, using different words, is that the international community objects
to the idea that an Irish Catholic working at CNN, for example, and converting
to Judaism in the hope of getting promoted, automatically becomes owner of
Palestine. And so, Weinberg objects to the objection of the international
community, and appeals to the Beltway crowd to do likewise.
David
Weinberg and company go on to complain that by the same reasoning, the
international community also rejects the idea that the “former” Irish has the
right to move to Palestine, push away a Palestinian family that has lived there
since the beginning of time, occupy its house and take possession of the
adjacent farm without being a colonist or colonialist. In the eyes of the
Weinbergs and those of the ilk, such rejection is so unfair to those who
convert, Trump had to do what he did, not because of politics, but because it
was the right thing to do.
For
these reasons, says David Weinberg, the international community is wrong, and
the American lawmakers and executives in charge of enforcing those laws, must
be careful not to accept the faulty interpretation of the international laws,
which America legislated together with the rest of the world.
Obviously
then, like a three-year old toddler, David Weinberg does not believe that what
he is saying amounts to insulting the intelligence of the American public
that’s reading his words. But he knows that he cannot stop here, and so he goes
on to explain why the Trump administration that keeps making a mockery of
international laws, is correct whereas the critics of the Trump moves are
wrong. Here is his explanation:
“Critics
of the Trump administration's determination that settlements are not illegal,
assert that it is motivated only by crass political considerations. These
critics are wildly off base. As long as the world deems Jewish settlements in
Judea and Samaria to be illegal and considers the territories stolen property,
the Palestinians have no reason to negotiate with Israel. What Washington has
done is put the Palestinians on notice that the United States will not deliver
Israeli concessions because peacemaking begins with truth-telling”.
And
this is what Trump's America has become, my friend: A self-appointed cop that
is so screwed up in the head, he tells the bank manager that as long as he
considers the money taken by the armed robber to be stolen property, the robber
will have no reason to negotiate returning the money or returning some of it or
anything of the sort.
That's
what the screwed-up cop does instead of informing the armed robber that as long
as he considers robbing the bank to have been a kosher operation admonished by
the God of the Old Testament, the bank manager will have no reason to negotiate
with him on anything.