Here is yet another article on the invented Jewish
refugees, said to have come out the Arab and Muslim lands. It escaped my notice
previously but someone brought it to my attention, and I am grateful for that.
It is an article that came under the title: “Don't
Forget the Jewish Refugees From Arab and Muslim Lands,” written by Jonathan S.
Tobin and published on December 3, 2019 in the Jewish online publication
Algemeiner. It is a thousand-word classic example of Jewish haggling which says
very little that's truthful, and nothing that's of any substance. But, like the
paintings of the impressionist era, it is aimed at creating a “sympathetic”
impression among the zombies of the Washington Beltway. This is how Tobin did
his part spitting in the American well, hoping to get something for Israel in
return for nothing.
Tobin knows he can no longer fool anyone by saying
that Jews streamed out of the Arab lands as refugees, having been dispossessed
of their wealth, and subjected to pogroms. But––like the typical Jew that he
is, and in the absence of the pound of flesh he would have carved out someone's
body––he tried to pull a golden fleece from the barrel of opportunity. He found
nothing in there and so, he went on to scrape the bottom of the barrel, hoping
to peel off a nugget or two that might still be there.
This is spitting in the well of the Beltway zombies,
which Tobin did in the hope that the magic of his saliva will prompt the
braindead zombies in charge of America's finances, to plunge their fingers into
the public purse and find the nuggets that he is looking for. Look now at the
way that he spoke to America's leaders, and compare it with the way you talk to
a child:
“Approximately 750,000 Arabs fled the
country [Palestine.] While some were forced out of their homes by Israel, most
did so voluntarily under the mistaken belief that conquering Arab forces would
soon allow them to return. At the same time, Jews living in the Arab world were
finding that their precarious status as dhimmi –– or second-class citizens who
were tolerated, though never granted equal rights –– was also undergoing a
change. Within a few years, Jewish communities were largely destroyed as riots
and heightened official discrimination drove hundreds of thousands from their
homes”.
He says that most Palestinians fled their homes under
the mistaken belief that Arab forces would allow them to return. Well, if the
Palestinians were happy campers in their homes to begin with, why would they
flee those homes in the hope that they will be allowed to return and be happy
campers again? Clearly, something is out of whack in this logic. Or to put it
in a form that Tobin would understand: something isn't kosher.
He also says that Jews living in the Arab world were
of the dhimmi status, which he translated as being second-class citizens. The
Jews were tolerated, he goes on to say, but never granted equal rights. Well,
if there is a reason to put the sham history of fake historians like Bernard
Lewis on the “garbage list,” this is it. Dhimmi means obligation, not
second-class citizen. The program was implemented during the twelfth century
when the Muslims were attacked by the Crusaders. To fight back, they enlisted
their Muslim citizens but could not ask those of other faiths to fight their
war for them.
So, the Muslims handed their businesses over to the
others, and took on the obligation (dhimmi) of defending those people. In
return, the Muslims asked the people to pay a war tax to bankroll the war. And
this became the obligation (dhimmi) of the others toward the Muslims. That
situation of mutual obligations, was maintained for as long as the war lasted.
It happened nine hundred years ago, in a small enclave of what is now Saudi
Arabia. It had nothing to do with the 22 countries that make up the modern Arab
world. But you wouldn't know this, reading the mutilated history of Bernard
Lewis on which most Jews, like Jonathan Tobin, build their grotesquely flawed
cases.
Tobin goes on to say that the Jews were tolerated, though never granted equal rights. He does
not say what rights they were denied because he may not know that those who
took on the citizenship of the country in which they resided, were treated like
any other citizen. As to the residents of every faith and every ethnic
background that kept the citizenship they came with––they were treated like
permanent foreign residents, were they Jewish or of another faith; were they
Hebrews or of another ethnic background.
And then, in the typically Jewish manner of trying to
have it both way, Jonathan Tobin shot himself in the foot. Look at the
following passage:
“Within a few years, Jewish
communities were largely destroyed as riots and official discrimination drove
hundreds of thousands from their homes. The totals were staggering. 259,000
left Morocco. 140,000 left Algeria. 100,000 left Tunisia. 120,000 left Iraq.
38,000 left Libya. 75,000 left Egypt. 55,000 left Yemen, 20,000 left Lebanon.
18,000 left Syria”.
That comes to a total of 825,000 Jews who came out of
nine Arab countries over a few years, he says. Well, during that time, those
nine countries averaged about 200 million people. This means one Jew out of 242
inhabitants left the Arab countries in an orderly manner over time. Compare
that with the 750,000 Palestinians that the Jews forced out of their homes from
the 1.5 million that lived in the country at the time, and the comparison will
blow your mind. It turns out that 1 in 2 Palestinians were dispossessed and
turned into a hasty refugee, which is 121 times more “staggering” than what
Tobin says was he Jewish orderly experience.