Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Presidential Speech Full of Subroutines

In the language of computers, a subroutine is a series of instructions; each meant to execute a given operation. An example would be this: Transfer the text displayed on the monitor to the printer. The subroutine can be called for with a word embedded inside a program, or called for with the click of a mouse pointing at a symbol. In effect, a program that makes up an entire operating system is largely made of subroutines, each of which is dedicated to executing a specific operation – from scanning the keyboard looking for an incoming input, to doing the most complex math operation.

Perhaps it is because we live in the computer age that people tend to think and communicate in ways that, to some extent, resemble the method of computers. We sometimes refer to such method as the bumper sticker approach. The way it works is that the mention of a word or a phrase during a conversation works like the clicking of a symbol on the computer screen. It results in the recall from memory of a set of images and narratives that would be familiar to the participants in the conversation.

More than anywhere else in the world, the North American people have proven to be the most susceptible at thinking and communicating in that style. And more than any other people in the world, the Jews have proven to be most apt at exploiting the method, making it work to their advantage. To verify these assertions, you only need to look at the publications that come under the Jewish influence where you will see the constant repetition of such phrases as: Egypt, where 20 percent of the population lives under the poverty line; Egypt, where the real unemployment rate is double the official rate, and so on. These are the subroutines that come to the mind of the journalists every time they sit down to bang on the keyboard of the computer the latest echo they picked up in the chamber of parrots.

This is also what you detect in most presidential speeches which say that the speeches are written by Jewish speechwriters or by people heavily influenced by them. A case in point is the speech delivered by President Obama at the UN General Assembly on September 24, 2013. In it, he spoke of the need to “send a powerful message” to the countries in the region. The truth is that when the people in the region decide to communicate with each other, they sit down and talk. It is only when they communicate with animals that they choose to send the message by body language or by taking some kind of action. For this reason, they don't like people sending messages to them in that manner, be they powerful messages or muted ones. These people feel insulted when someone tries to send them a message through what they view as the language of animals.

Another Jewish inspired subroutine that annoys the people of the Middle East is to be accused of having a fixation on American conspiracies. The way that something along this line starts is when the Americans openly speak of having ideas and designs for the region, including the possible use of the military to implement them. Most of the time the Americans make no bones about the interest they have in the welfare of Israel to the point of doing anything they deem necessary to protect what they call America's core interest in the region. They say they are adding to the defense capabilities of Israel when the Israelis themselves call it adding to their attack capabilities. If this is not conspiracy, what is it?

The worst part is that the situation does not end with the demonstration that the Arabs have good reasons to be annoyed. This is achieved when they show that the idea of conspiracy is generated by the Americans themselves, and that it is reinforced by the Israelis who work in concert with the Jewish publications produced in America. When this happens, the Americans respond with accusations to the effect that the Arabs have an irrational fear of America taking control of the Middle East. No, say the Arabs, all they want is that the Americans keep their noses out of Arab affairs. No, no, no, say the Americans, the fact is that “You know nossing about za damacracy of za Shamir” and they are here to shove this brand of democracy down the throats of Arabs.

This done, the Americans flatter themselves via a habit that the Jews handed to them on a silver platter. It began at the start of the Jewish control of America when the Americans could still feel the sense of shame. It used to be that when they went too far implementing a Jewish suggestion, normal people expressed annoyance, and the Americans backed off. But the Jews told them not to back off because if people are annoyed, it is not because of something they did or failed to do but because America is powerful, free and has developed a superior way of life. People hate America, said the Jews, because of what it is which is why the Americans must shrug off any and every criticism directed at them. And so the Americans started to say that given America's role in the world, it is inevitable that the world should hate it. And this is what President Obama has echoed in his speech to the UN.

And speaking of Egypt, the President went on to complain: “America has been attacked by all sides of their internal conflict, accused of supporting the Muslim brotherhood and engineering its removal from power. In fact, the United States has avoided choosing sides. Our interest has been to encourage a government that reflects the will of the Egyptian people and recognizes true democracy as requiring a respect for minority rights and the rule of law, freedom of speech and assembly, and a strong civil society. That remains our interest today.”

And there lies the problem. A spokesman from one side or the other of the political divide accusing America of interfering in their struggle is not what the Egyptian population as a whole is accusing America of. What the people are saying has to do with this: “Our [American] interest has been true democracy, a respect for minority rights, the rule of law, freedom of speech and assembly and a strong civil society.” And the worst part is this: “That remains our interest today.”

Well, with all due respect to the American President, the people of Egypt who assembled by the millions to articulate the democratic will of the majority as well as the minorities, are telling America in one united voice: “You can take your damacracy of za Shamir, Uncle Sam, and shove it.” America is not big enough, wise enough, free enough or respected enough to tell them how to establish the rule of law, maintain freedom of speech or create a strong civil society. You have no lesson in this regard to give to the world, America. Begin by freeing yourself of Jewish domination and when you've done this, we might consider discussing governance with you.

The people of Egypt have spoken, and they said to America: “Get out of here and stay out.” And you know what, my friend; this is becoming the subroutine that the people over there are adopting in case their message fails to penetrate the thick skull of the failing Jewish States of America.