Putin of Russia is not surrounded by an army of Jewish dogs
barking at him: do it, do it, do it; and this is why he does not get
embarrassed. The Chinese leaders are not surrounded by an army of Jewish dogs
barking at them: do it, do, do it; and this is why they do not get embarrassed.
In contrast, Barack Obama of America
is surrounded by an army of Jewish dogs constantly barking at him: do it, do
it, do it; and this is why he constantly gets embarrassed.
And here comes another Jewish dog that goes by the name of
Stanley Kurtz trying to maintain the tradition of reducing superpower America to the level of super-clown America .
He barked his newest bark moments after President Obama delivered his latest
installment demonstrating to the world that the American democracy is run not
by the people for the people of America
but run by Jewish dogs for the benefit of the Netanyahus of this world and for
World Jewry.
Stanley Kurtz wrote: “Syria
Is Not Iran ”
and had it published on August 31, 2013 in National Review Online. You can
already see in the first paragraph how he sets the stage for the next phase of
taking America
down the path of clownsmanship. Here is that paragraph in abridged form:
“Preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons is centrally important.
Upholding norms against chemical weapons is not. Treating the two as equivalent
is a mistake. Yet this claim was at the core of Obama's argument today for an
attack on Syria ,
and will be in our upcoming debate.”
Having come out by the thousands and barked: Hit Syria to
deliver a mortal blow to Iran, here is what the dogs of war and childish
behavior are now barking: “To the extent that a strike on Syria is connected to
Iran's drive to develop nuclear weapons, the link is a function of the
president's ill-advised and barely thought-out drawing of a red line against
chemical weapons use by Assad.” Do they now say “ill-advised” when they were
the ones who so advised? Are they admitting they are ill? Do they realize at
last that they are mental cases beyond salvation?
Apparently not; a deduction that can be made from what Kurtz
does next. And what he does is use the argument for and against striking Syria to shift
gear. He explains that once the red line was drawn, America had no choice but to act.
However, America
desperately needs a new foreign policy; one that is not based on the futile
attempts to change the region's political culture. And this, my friend, is a
direct repudiation of their own cry, the one that broke America's back in the
Middle East: Zey know nossing about za damacracy of za Shamir.
Having disposed of the old gear, the author now describes
the new gear. As usual, he gets into it gently so as not to alarm anyone;
aiming of course to mission-creep later on. Look how he does that: “This does
not mean a decision about striking Iran has to be made right now. It
does mean that [the subject] needs to be addressed in our upcoming debate.”
And that will be the time when the Jewish dogs will come out
of hiding and bark the new demands. At first, you will only see and hear a few
low level barks. But they will gradually increase in number and ferocity to
again ill-advise the administration into breaking what is left of America 's back
or get embarrassed once more. And all this will happen while Putin of Russia,
the Chinese leaders, the Assads of this world and the mullahs will sit back and
have a good laugh at clown America
making a fool of himself.
That was the philosophy. But every philosophy must have a
concrete plan behind it to make it work. And Kurtz has that too. But who do you
think he calls on to make this thing work? You guessed it, the Congress of
assholes. You can't have barking dogs without braying asses, can you? Here is
what the author is suggesting: “a congressional vote against action in Syria should be accompanied by a non-biding
resolution highlighting the importance of the red line we have already drawn
against a nuclear Iran .”
Did he say “we” have drawn? Who was that “we”? Is Netanyahu
standing at the podium in front of the UN General Assembly drawing a red line,
an American we? Voila, my dear friends, the Jewish dogs of America now
want to drag the whole nation, and make it stand behind its new leader – none
other than master trainer of the clowns; the man himself, the one and only Bibi
Netanyahu from the cuckoo-land of the bozos.
But poor Stanley Kurtz is apprehensive because he realizes
that he and his army of barking dogs may have overplayed their hand already.
Watch him cry: “My fear is that ill-advised interventions such as Libya and Syria
are weakening the American public's resolve to stand against a nuclear Iran . We've
taken our eye off the ball. Futile interventions are sapping our resolve. An
agonizing national debate followed by reluctant agreement to go where the
president should never have dragged us to begin with won't scare the mullahs.”
Did he say it was the president that dragged them? Can't these Jews show one
iota of shame at least once in a million years?
And there he goes again replaying the old symphony of the
barks to end his presentation: “The dynamic of deterrence backed up by credible
threats of force is being undermined by the incoherence of our policy in the
Middle East … The way to overcome this destructive cycle is to create clarity …
putting Iran's nuclear program at the top of our list.”
Clarity? Did he say clarity? Maybe he means the Jewish moral
clarity of the ambiguous that has already transformed America 's
purpose in the world from a straight arrow to a pretzel.
It is time for President Obama to put his foot down and tell
the Jewish barking dogs to just shut up and listen to the voices of reason
before opening their mouths again.