Saturday, January 4, 2014

Moral Equivalence of the Syphilitic Kind

The editors of the New York Times have managed to come up with yet another editorial that demonstrates how the ejaculation of Jewish moral syphilis works its deadly magic in the American media, the result of which can exceed even the creation of numerous problems around the world. More importantly, the Jewish intrigues result in the subjugation of America as a nation, an act that comes about when the control of its abominable congress is secured, and the bending of its members to the demonic will of World Jewry is completed.

The Times editorial was given the title: “The Ticking Mideast Clock” and was published on January 4, 2014. Refreshingly, you do not see in it the old habit of pleading with the Israelis to stop doing this or that because it would be in the interest of the Israelis themselves to stop doing this or that, not because of what harm it does to others. And do you know what this or that would have been, my friend? They would have been crimes against humanity of the most abhorrent kind. Unfortunately, however, a new habit seems to have taken hold in replacement of the old and the apparently discarded habit.

The new habit is to draw a partial list of Israel's horrible crimes, and call them impediment to reaching a solution to the conflict but then quickly soften the blow on Israel. And this is done by drawing a moral equivalence between the list of Israeli crimes and the infractions that were alleged to have been committed by the Palestinians. These infractions – more likely to have been imagined than real – would be so trivial in any case, it is as if the American editors concur with the Jewish view that if a Palestinian spits on the shoe of an Israeli, this indiscretion gives the green light for American made warplanes to balance things out by firing American made smart bombs into Palestinian homes, and kill as many Palestinians as happen to be there at the time.

Here is the partial list of Israel's crimes as cited by the Times editors: “Standing beside Mr. Kerry, Israel's Netanyahu delivered a harsh assessment of ... the prospect of a peace agreement. Days earlier, Israel let it be known it would build more settlements in the West bank, further poisoning the political atmosphere while shrinking the territorial space for a deal. Hardliners in Netanyahu's government are pushing a bill that would annex settlements in the West bank where about 6,000 Israeli settlers and 10 times as many Palestinians live.”

And what follows are the infractions that the editors of the Times allege were committed by the Palestinians. You will notice how trivial they are, and how the editors treat them. Here is one of two passages: “There are questions about the Palestinian commitment as well. Palestinian leaders [not specified who or how many they were] have said that any new settlement activity could lead them to seek membership in the International Criminal Court and sue Israel there, a move they [again not specified who or how they were] had promised not to take when peace talks started.” Thus, according to editors that happen to live in the most litigious country on Earth, for someone to say that if the talks get nowhere after many decades of attempts, they may go to court and seek relief there, casts a pall on their commitment to peace.

And here is the second passage: “In his remark Mr. Netanyahu claimed that members of the Palestinian security forces were involved in a recent attack against Israelis. Mr. Abbas should investigate the claim, and if it is true, bring those responsible to justice. He also needs to crack down on the incitement of hatred against Israel in Palestinian schools, textbooks and government-controlled media.” Did they say government? When did it happen that the Palestinian authority became a Palestinian government?

Never mind answering that question because there is more to the passage than the Freudian slip. You will notice that all what Netanyahu needed to do was mouth-crap a stinking accusation never heard of before, and in a knee-jerk fashion, the American editors issued the command: “investigate and bring those responsible to justice.” This, my friend is how World Jewry was able to take control of the Congress and subjugated the whole of America. It happened because while the world laughed off the Jewish mouth-crapping of stinking dumps such as that, and while the world avoided the comparable Jewish ejaculations of moral syphilis, the American Congress took such commands seriously and obeyed them to fully bend to the demonic will of World Jewry.

And this is not all that the editors of the Times have written. Here is the rest of it: “Abbas also needs to crack down on the incitement of hatred against Israel.” Apparently no one told the low-life hateful characters at the Times that humanity's hatred for the Jewish modus vivendi will not end till the Jews stop taking advantage of the retardation that is so prevalent in the American publishing industry, to wit the one displayed at the New York Times.

That is the place where a legitimate criticism of Israel by people living under its military occupation for several generations, is considered an expression of antisemitism that threatens Israel's existence, whereas a steady drum of hate and incitement by thousands of Jewish writers and their running dogs against Israel's enemy of the day (such as the current Iran) is considered to be a blessed exercise of the First Amendment. And so, they all run around – Jews and gentiles alike – beating their breasts while mumbling something that goes like this: “We are the best; they are the worst” not realizing that the world is steadily putting its house in order while America is slowly becoming the private shit-house of Netanyahu and his full-of-it sycophants.

What comes after that in the Times editorial is so thoughtless, you wonder what goes on inside the head of these editors, if anything is going on in there. First, they cite the reality that Netanyahu chose to release Palestinian prisoners rather than halt settlement construction, which should tell them where he has his priorities. Then they tell what Mr. Kerry is doing, and warn that the framework accord he is working on “must not become yet another agreement that leaves Palestinians with empty promises.” But given where he has his priorities, they should know that this is exactly what he will do as long as the retarded in America will keep encouraging him.

Apparently the Times editors are totally oblivious of that reality and so, instead of recommending that all American aid to Israel must halt till the latter makes peace with its neighbors, they recommend this: “The accord will need to be embraced and defended by Mr. Netanyahu and Mr. Abbas [who must] learn to compromise and live as states, side by side.”

Well, listen here you assholes of the New York Times; Palestine becoming a state is exactly what Israel does not want. And this is why Netanyahu's priority is to keep building Jewish settlements on stolen Palestinian lands.

What a waste of time and space to have published an editorial as shabby as this! And they get paid for that.