Throughout history all sorts of dominions around the planet
were ruled by all sorts of regimes before the so-called Liberal-Democracies
were established in some places, such as Europe ,
and not in other places. Despite the claim to the effect that because these
nations had a special something about them, they were destined from the start
to adopt that system of government, the fact remains that only random
historical occurrences have generated the forces that led those nations to
adopt that system.
What's more, the historical record shows that this group of
democracies lived for thousands of years with the demons that everyone else
lived with. They democratized for a short period of time but seem to be coming
full circle now; and this is happening at a time when the non-democratic
nations are beginning to rethink the system under which they have been
operating. Thus, the two groups are going through some kind of transformation
with the difference that the old demons are returning to the
Liberal-Democracies – albeit in a different form – while the non-democracies
are experimenting with something that comes close to a democracy – albeit in a
form that suits them better. In short, the two groups seem to trade places.
And this leads to the question: What is happening to the
Liberal-Democracies at this time? Well, it is happening to some of them – the United States of America ,
for example – which is being pulled into the embrace of the old demons both
on the national and the international stages. Whereas in the old days, the
local government in the European nations reflected the work of a dictatorship;
and whereas the international relations reflected a continuous state of
conflict, these conditions have returned to America but with a twist. It is
that the local dictators are not local people anymore but Jews who have managed
to impose themselves on the system. As to the international relations, they are
run by the overseas entity known as Israel to which American foreign policy
– under the pressure and the connivance of local Jews – has been subcontracted.
And what about the nations that did not democratize at the
same time as did the Europeans? What is happening to them at this time? Well,
it happens that these nations are coming under the same sort of forces which
led the European nations to democratize a century or two before. It is the
power of industrialization, and the various forces that this phenomenon
normally unleashes on a society. But these being different societies living at
a different time, they experience the forces of change and respond to them in a
slightly different way.
Still, industry is the great equalizer because it injects
into society an element that compels a change in human relations. That element
is the compression of time. Whereas agriculture and construction used to be the
main industries of the past, the assembly line has become the main industry of
the industrial age. The first progresses in months, seasons and years; the
second progresses in hours, minutes and seconds. Control of the first is passed
on by inheritance from one generation to the next; control of the second
remains largely in the hands of the entrepreneurs and the inventors that launch
it.
Whereas in the old days, the worker that did not perform his
duties in total obedience of the master could be disposed of and replaced by
another without worrying about diminished productivity, the worker on the
production line has a better control of his destiny because an hour of his time
that is lost to the assembly line can make an appreciable dent in the
profitability of the operation. He may not have become an exact equal to the
owner of the enterprise where he works, but he can talk to the boss without
bowing, even quit his job to start his own enterprise and compete against what
is now his former boss.
These realities brought about the revolutions that compelled
the old fiefdoms of Europe to adopt the
democratic system of government which they enjoyed for a while but could not
sustain for long without having a continuous high rate of growth in the
economy. They needed that growth to absorb the new entrants into the industrial
age, those migrants that came to the urban industrial regions from the farming
communities. And this is why the Europeans turned to the colonization of other
countries; and why America
turned to the ownership of slaves.
When the colonization of a country by another, and when the
enslavement of a human being by another were coming to an end, the industrial
democracies found themselves unable to sustain the growth upon which they
relied in the past. They responded by adopting a kind of immigration policy and
guest worker programs that allowed them to stay in business and remain viable
as a system. And because the other nations were duplicating what the
Democracies had gone through before, they were now able to register the growth
that was eluding the old Democracies. The result has been that they started to
accumulate the surpluses they could lend to the old Democracies. It is that the
tables were turned, a situation in which the lenders became borrowers, and the
borrowers became lenders.
This is where the Jews and Israel have entered the picture,
and said to the old Democracies they may not be aware of it but they are living
in a state of existential threat. Their salvation depends on the guidance of
the Jews who, in a nutshell, recommend the rehabilitation of the old demons:
colonization and enslavement. These two need not look the same as before but
they should play the same old roles.
And the Jewish leaders, working in concert with Israel , have
been maneuvering what they call the “West” ever since that time. They got it to
give them all the help upon which they rely to maintain the colonization of Palestine . And this is
something they are able to do, ironically, because they found a way to maintain
the West in a constant state of moral slavery to their pompous buffoonery. They
got the slaves, and so they can maintain their grip on the colony.