It is accepted in biology that cross-breeding among
strangers is better than in-breeding among close family members because
cross-breeding strengthens the immune system of the offspring whereas
in-breeding transmits the family diseases to the offspring.
Something similar happens to the cultures that try to breed
new ideas by referencing themselves rather than reach out to the cultures that
may be at odds with them on some issues. You see an example of this when you go
over the David Harsanyi article that came under the title: “On Israel , Obama
Has No Clue What He's Talking About” and the subtitle: “No, Mr. President, the
Jewish state is not doomed.” It was published in The Federalist on March 3,
2014.
The Harsanyi article is a response to an interview that was
conducted with President Obama a day or two before, during which the President
warned that time was running out on Israel if it refuses to endorse the latest
American proposal for peace with the Palestinians it has kept under occupation
for more than three generations using American military and financial aid as
well as diplomatic protection in world forums. The author of the article
expresses deep indignation at the fact that Obama and John Kerry are saying that
it is becoming exceedingly difficult for America
to shield Israel from the
repercussions and boycotts that will emerge if Israel rejects the proposed
agreement.
In response, Harsanyi reminds the readers that Israel has been condemned with 131 resolutions
at the United Nations since 1967, and that it is censured by governments across
Western Europe every time it adds new
settlements on stolen Palestinian lands. It has survived all of that, he says,
and will easily handle anything that the world will throw at it in the future
because nothing will be as threatening as what came in the past. To buttress
his argument, he quotes William A. Jacobson who pointed out that: “threats from
the international union of thugs, tin pot dictators, and anti-Semites, also
known as the U.N. General Assembly, even went so far as to declare Zionism is
Racism.” This is not a manifestation of incest due to the excessive love of
one's kind; it is incest due to the visceral hatred of everyone else.
He says that America can again hold off what he calls the
international mob if it wants to, which is why he is indignant about what
President Obama and Secretary of State Kerry have said. He explains that this
calls into question America 's
willingness to continue supporting Israel . But engaging in loose talk
was a bad thing to do; he goes on to say, because it will encourage the
Palestinians to reject the peace proposal. Here again, he expresses hatred for
Obama and Kerry who might not stand by Israel this time; and he ascribes evil
intent to the Palestinians who will be encouraged to reject the peace proposal
as a result of the Obama-Kerry loose talk. But is this a hint that Israel will
finally accept the deal he fears the Palestinians may reject? He does not say.
In the meantime, he says that a Gallop poll conducted in
2013 shows that Americans sympathize with Israelis to the tune of 64 percent,
and sympathize with the Palestinians to the tune of 12 percent. What he does
not say – perhaps because he is too young to remember – is that Gallup used to be a
respected poll-taking agency till something happened. It started to deteriorate
and kept getting worse to the point where people now look at its findings and
consider the reverse of what it says to be true. Some people did just that during
the last presidential election and it worked very well for them because Gallup was predicting
that Obama will lose by a large margin but won by a large margin. Applying the
same approach to what Gallup now says about the Middle East , it means that the American people favor the
Palestinians over the Israelis by a 64 to 12 ratio.
Getting back to the notion of who may be accepting the
American proposal and who may be rejecting it, Harsanyi goes back to the
business of practicing incest to reference his answer. He says that “nearly all
reports indicate it is Abbas that's slowing down the process toward a deal.”
And when you ask: Who is that “all”? He answers: Haaretz, The Israel Times and
the Jerusalem Post. Fantastic eh! What can be more incestuous than that? No
wonder the guy is breeding monstrous creations.
And the biggest monstrosity that these people breed is when
they mutilate history like a bunch of jackals would tear at the limbs of a
rabbit. He does in this article what the Jews have done time after time, which
is to misrepresent the fact that it was the Israelis who torpedoed every peace
proposal made by someone, including the Americans, then blamed the failure on
the Palestinians.
Our author now does what Jews and Israelis have always done
which is to speak in the past tense. They keep making the claim that they have
accepted every peace proposal presented to them but that the Palestinians
rejected them all. When the Israeli leaders are asked to forget the past and
tell what they will accept now, they refuse to give an answer. This is because
if they do, that's what they will get and no more, when what they want is all
of Palestine .
And all of Palestine
is what they have wanted all along, and what they plan to steal by the force of
American arms and finances however long it takes.
And the expression of all the Harsanyi hatred for the
Palestinians; for humanity, America ,
John Kerry and Obama is what makes an increasing number of Americans move to
the view that the only solution is the Final Solution. They do not see how a
handful of Jews can be right all the time whereas 7 billion people can be wrong
all the time.