I am not for the death penalty and never have been. What
follows is not condoning the death sentences handed down by an Egyptian court
to a large number of people but a reflection of what I have suspected for
sometime now which is that a group in America headed by a number of editorial
writers at the New York Times and elsewhere would sacrifice the lives of 9
million or so Christians in Egypt to fulfill the Jewish dream of seeing the
country burn to the ground ... thus fulfill a prophecy of the Jewish bible.
The evidence is all here in the editorial that came under
the title: “Egypt 's
Miscarriage of Justice” and published on March 25, 2014. You get hit with the
evidence in the face like a cannon ball in the very first paragraph: “the court
verdict … for the killing of a single police officer...” The fact is that the
death of the police officer was incidental to what happened. And what happened was that the rioters who
went on trial chose Minya to do their dastardly deeds because the city has a
large Christian population, and a number of the most ancient and grandest
churches.
The rioters knew that this will attract the attention of
those who would back them in America not because they love Islam – they hate it
– but because they hate the Christians as well, and they want to see the two
fight each other to extinction as it almost happened in Lebanon under Israeli
influence; as it almost happened in Iraq under American occupation; as it is
happening in many places in sub-Saharan Africa where people are so poor, the
evil hand of foreign instigators hire killers for little money, and push them
to go on sectarian killing sprees.
And here is what the editors of the New York Times do to
hide their intent while continuing to promote the idea of seeing Egypt burn to
the ground: “The verdict … represents an escalation of the military-led
government. It will further radicalize the group's members. And it will almost
surely worsen instability in one of the Arab world's most important countries.”
But the fact is that the government had nothing to do with this verdict where
the interim President of the country came from the judiciary.
Furthermore the people at the Times and elsewhere who have
been predicting a civil war in Egypt, and have time after time used the words
“worsen” and “instability” to describe what is happening in the country when
nothing of the sort is happening – are at it again using those same words as if
they burned with the desire to psyche the sickos in Egypt to do them the big
favor of destabilizing the country and make things worse.
Follow for a while what these horrible creatures say, and
you will realize that their desire can become so strong at times; they begin to
believe that the desire has become reality, and they speak of it as such.
Instigating internal dissent is the tool of the coward that
cannot defeat an opponent on the battlefield. So then, what do creatures like
the editors of the New York Times do to instigate internal descent? They speculate,
but they cherry-pick what it is they speculate about. Here is an example: “It
is impossible to know whether the court in the city of Minya where the verdicts were handed down was
caught up in animosity against Mr. Morsi … or was acting on directions from
security officials.” It was neither. It was the sight of burned up churches
that revolted the people of that city, including the judges who decided on that
verdict. They may have overreacted but there will be appeals and reviews before
the conclusion of this matter.
What else do the demons at the New York Times do to send “a
strong signal” or as they would say: “a strooong signal” to every sicko in Egypt
that might read their editorial? What they do is highlight something that has
nothing to do with the trial they pretend to be discussing. That something were
the violations committed by some members of the military and the police a while
ago, for which trials were held and a number of officers convicted.