Nothing is more fitting at this time than to ask the
question: Why is it that after decades of exclusive Jewish advice to America on
all sorts of foreign policy matters, but especially the Middle East; the Jews
are now saying that the world – and more so the Middle East – are going to
hell? Predictably, they also blame everyone except themselves for taking the
world, including the Middle East , to such a
dangerous place.
Unfortunately, we may never get a definitive answer to that
question because the ones who can answer it are the Jews. And they are not
talking because they consider themselves to be so infallible, they must not
respond to a question that might lead them to admit inadvertently they can make
mistakes. They fear that if this happens, it will open the door for them to
take responsibility for some of the things that go bad – if not all the things
that come under their purview and go bad.
But what is it about Jewish thinking that makes these people
view the world through a lens that is distorting to such an extent? It is that
the concept of limit has not fully matured in the Jewish culture … and will
never mature because if it does, the entire culture will collapse. And it is
the absence of such limit – when discussing some subjects – that forces the
Jews to speak in superlatives a good deal of the time. That absence is also
what makes the Jews look at two identical or near identical parallels, and fail
to see a relationship between them.
This happens if one of the parallels applies to a gentile,
and the other applies to a Jew. To take an exaggerated example that will
illustrate a point, imagine an old woman walking on the sidewalk. Behind her
walk two young men; one clearly a Jew and one clearly a gentile. You and your
Jewish colleague are walking behind the young men. The old woman stops and
opens the purse. The wind blows money out of it; some of which is grabbed by
each of the young men. They hurriedly cross the street and run away as fat as
they can.
You curse the young men but your Jewish colleague objects
because (get this now) you equated – yes, he says you “equated” – the two young
men when it is obvious they were not motivated by the same intent. It is clear
to him that the gentile young man will spend the money on himself whereas the
Jewish young man will find a worthy charitable cause on which to spend the
money. Your colleague came to that conclusion because the gentile young man is
a product of the prevailing culture whereas the Jewish young man is the product
of a Jewish culture that is powered by unlimited virtues.
Now examine the piece that was written by the editors of the
Wall Street Journal under the title “The Senate's Iran Distraction” and the
subtitle: “Republicans should focus on persuading the American people.” It was
published in the Journal on March 10, 2015. Concentrate on this passage:
“Equating elected Senators with the Revolutionary Guard Corps is itself a
political stunt, but that's how Obama plays.”
The fact is that there are all sorts of regimes on this
planet, and each is run by a cadre of people that have counterparts in the
other regimes. When communication is done between the regimes, it is done
between counterparts that are of the same level. This is why the American Senators
addressed their open letter to the leaders of Iran (meaning to whom it may
concern) aside from Ayatollah Khamenei who, according to them, is negotiating
with Barack Obama, his counterpart.
This is why Obama identified the Revolutionary Guard Corps
as being the counterpart that will receive the American message. Now, given
what is known about this group, Obama found it ironic that members of the
Congress would want to make common cause with it. But this view should not have
come as a surprise to anyone given that the Jewish propaganda machine has often
expressed the hope that the Ayatollah himself will nix the deal which they say,
Obama desperately wants to finalize. Maybe, like say, that's how Obama plays,
and that's fine. But this is also how the Jewish led editors of the Journal
think and write, and that's lousy.
Having accused the President of staging a political stunt,
the editors lament that the letter of the senators is a distraction which takes
away from the work that needs to be done. But what would that work be? It would
be “the main political goal of persuading the American people.” It is politics
again as you can see. Anymore politics? Yes, the editors imagine that Obama
knows the “Republicans are playing politics.”