Contrary to the Jewish moral clarity that leads to the
toilet, the moral clarity of the gentile races populating the planet, leads to
enlightenment. An example of the morality that the world hungers for these days
would be a declaration that the Iranians, like everyone else, have the right to
produce nuclear weapons if they so wish.
But the fact that the Iranians are negotiating to curb their
ability to do so, says something about the human spirit that powers these
people. We must, therefore, conclude that unlike the Jews who describe
themselves as being a breed of exaggerated and laughable qualities, the
Iranians have shown to be enlightened human beings – even if they are too
modest to trumpet their qualities to the world.
Being diagonally opposite in temperament and character to
the Iranians, the Jews have spent the last four decades trying to convince the
world of a reality they say is as clear to them as the ambiguous assertion
Israel may or may not possess untested weapons of the nuclear kind. They have
been making these assertions while howling the fear that the Iranians pose an
ambiguous threat to their existence. Go figure.
The reader can get a sense as to how this drama plays itself
out on the world stage because the players are giving a new performance at this
time, and Bret Stephens wrote a column about it. His piece came under the
title: “The Capitulationist” and the subtitle: “The Obama administration
refuses to negotiate openly, lest the extent of its diplomatic surrender to Iran
be prematurely and fatally exposed.” It was published on March 31, 2015 in the
Wall Street Journal.
The position that Stephens is taking is that President Obama
has capitulated to the Iranians at the negotiations that were held to curb the
ability of the latter to produce nuclear weapons should they wish to do so. The
approach that Stephens is taking to make his points is to highlight what Obama
has said in the past, and what Stephens says he is agreeing to now. The author
concentrates on three points he calls: Fordo, Arak and advanced centrifuges.
First, whereas Obama once said that the Iranians do not need
an underground, fortified facility such as the one at Fordo, to have a peaceful
program, he is now letting them run hundreds of centrifuges at that facility.
What happened between then and now? Negotiations happened.
It is clear that while the Jews are apprehensive about the intentions of the
Iranians for no reason at all, the Iranians have apprehensions about Jewish America
for a good reason. It is that Israel
bombed the peaceful nuclear programs in Iraq
and Syria using the help it
received from America .
It will not hesitate to do the same in Iran if it could. And Mr. Obama
could not guarantee that this will not happen. The Iranians had no choice but
to protect their assets. They are wise people.
Second, whereas Obama once said that the Iranians do not
need a heavy-water reactor such as the one at Arak to have a peaceful nuclear program, he
and the other Western powers are now only asking that the reactor be
reconfigured to produce less plutonium … and the Iranians have agreed to that.
What happened for this change of heart to occur?
Negotiations happened. Since plutonium has a dual purpose: one civilian
requiring small quantities of it, and one military requiring larger quantities,
the Iranians have agreed to reconfigure the reactor and produce small
quantities, thus curb their ability to produce bombs.
Third, whereas Obama once said that the Iranians do not need
some of the advanced centrifuges they currently possess, Iran is
building 3,000 of them.
What happened? Negotiations happened. The truth is that Iran has large
deposits of uranium. Given that it will run out of oil and natural gas in a few
decades, it will rely on nuclear energy to power its industries and light its
cities. It may also sell some of that energy to foreign buyers.
Rather than sell raw uranium as if they were “drawers of
water and hewers of wood,” the Iranians want to process their own resources and
sell them as finished or semi-finished products. To do this and be competitive
with other nations, they will need all the centrifuges they can build, as
advanced as they can make them.
In addition to that, Stephens mentions the matter of
ballistic missiles. Well, the Iranians, like everyone else, have the right to
explore space, go to the moon, and go to Mars and to the other planets. That's
what ballistic missiles will allow them to do. And who has the right to tell
them not to?
So how does a Jew like Bret Stephens make it sound as if –
despite all of that – the Iranians are the bad guys while the Jews are the good
guys? Answer: He does the very Jewish thing of attributing to the Iranians the
filth he sees in the Jews; and attributing to the Jews the nobility he detects
in the Iranians.
Here is an example of that: “Iran 's habit of lulling the world
with a cascade of small infractions is an ingenious way to advance its program
without provoking a crisis.” No, that's not Iran . That's what the Jews have been
doing with regard to the occupation of Palestine .
The evidence is there, poking more than 14 billion human eyes everyday for
decades – with no end in sight.
And this is why no one has tried to pogrom or holocaust the
Iranians whereas these punishments have accompanied the Jews everywhere they
went, every time they presented themselves to someone. Their bad habits are not
only a reflection of their DNA; they are their DNA.