To put things simply, we could say that “democracy” means to
govern a nation with the consent of its population. But there is another kind
of governance; one that is more widespread in the world than most people
realize. It is governance that is made to look democratic but in reality is a
demonic form of rule. For this reason, it would be appropriate to call it
“demon-cracy or demoncracy.”
Before I discuss what this is about, let me tell you a true
story. When I opened my school in Montreal
and had problems with the landlord, I moved to a building that used to be
rented by a union representing the employees of the Canadian Broadcasting
Corporation (CBC). In fact the building was not too far from the CBC tower. For
a while, people – mostly technicians – dropped in on us, perhaps because they
wanted to see what happened to the “old homestead,” as one of them put it, or
because they were confused about the union's address. Some of these people got
interested in what we were teaching, and kept visiting us when they had the
time.
I developed a close friendship with two of them such that I
was made privy to the sort of information that does not make it to the public
domain. These were truly the kind of “stories behind the stories.” The one that
interested me the most was that of the English speaking female reporter who was
assigned to spy on a group calling itself: “Jews for Jesus” or some such name.
It was a group that the Canadian Jewish Congress wished to obliterate, thus
wanted someone who was trusted by the group to gather dirt on its members. They
wanted the dirt not to broadcast it, but to hand it to the Canadian Jewish
Congress.
The story of that reporter/spy was known to the people at
the lowest level of the CBC hierarchy, therefore must have been known to those
who sit higher up in the Corporation since nothing in that place failed to
filter up, I was told … and yet no one did anything to put a stop to the
practice of using a reporter to spy on a legitimate group. To me, this is a
symptom of what demoncratic rule looks like. But a full blown manifestation of
this kind of governance screams at the world from the chambers that make up the
American Congress.
The main question to ask is this: How did the act of using
reporters to spy on groups opposed to the Jewish establishment, develop into an
organization such as AIPAC that has managed to control not only the American
Congress, but the entire English speaking world? Well, an article written by
Matthew Continetti and published on March 28, 2015 in National Review Online
(NRO) under the title: “James Baker's Zombie Foreign Policy,” is but a real
example of the intermediary steps that were employed to go from the level of
the lowly reporter to that of the AIPAC monster.
In the same way that the Canadian Jewish Congress went after
the group “Jews for Jesus” some time ago, the entire Jewish Establishment in
America today is using the media outlets it controls (such as NRO) to destroy a
rising rival group calling itself J Street. The occasion was that people who
left their mark on history such as former Secretary of State James Baker; and
people who are currently making history such as White House chief of staff
Denis McDonough, have visited the rival and have spoken to its members. In the
words of Continetti, this legitimizes J
Street and suggests “a division in GOP ranks when
there isn't any.”
Thus, to destroy J Street before it gets to be fully
legitimate in the eyes of the Jewish Establishment, the author of the article
unleashes a diatribe that is aimed at destroying the good name that James Baker
has made for himself over the decades through hard work, sharp intellect, and
the kind of courage that a hundred of today's Congressional dogs could not
replicate no matter how loudly they bark, and no matter for how long they
maintain their threatening posture.
Why did Continetti go through the trouble of developing a
diatribe of this lethality? He did it because James Baker is on the list of
advisers that were retained by Jeb Bush, a man on the verge of announcing his
candidacy to run for President of the United States . And what the author
of the article wants to see happen is what he expresses in this passage: “It's
W.'s advice Jeb Bush should listen to, not Jim Baker's.” But why is that?
Because Continetti believes that the W. shaped the current
policies of the Republican Party which remains strong on defense, hawkish and
unabashedly pro-Israel.