Saturday, March 21, 2015

Half a Century writing Scripts of Fiction

The difference between writing a script of fiction and writing about a real life situation is that in describing an event, fiction allows you to state or show anything you want if it will make the scene “work” … meaning make it look and feel plausible. By contrast, when describing an event that has unfolded in real life, requires that you give ample details, and be accurate about all of them because human beings are instinctively biased toward the suspicion that the devil is in the details.

Having learned that lesson from centuries of bitter experience gained from trial-and-error, the Jewish leaders who planned the takeover of America more than half a century ago came up with the idea of accusing anyone who might doubt what they say as being anti-Semitic. This trick helped them stop the flow of push-backs that could have weakened the falsehoods they put out in the public domain over the decades.

Thus protected from being exposed as the charlatans that they are while posing as pundits, the Jews wrote what they pretended to be real life situations … but without the requirement that they authenticate what they say with any sort of corroboration or detail. The end result is that they compiled a narrative which – seen in retrospect – turned out to be a half-century massive work of mutilated history and pure fiction.

This approach is shown in the piece that was written by the editors of National Review Online (NRO) under the title: “Obama Manufactures an Israel Crisis,” published on March 20, 2015. They begin the piece complaining that they are disturbed because the White House is “ignoring the torrent of hate and hypocrisy that has issued forth from the Palestinian side for years, and now using its own words to drive a real wedge between the United States and Israel.”

But the editors of NRO offer not a shred of evidence or detail to back what they say. By contrast, what is known to the readers of this website is that nearly 1400 postings – each reviewing between 1 and 4 articles written by Jews or their lackeys – push back against the torrent of hate and hypocrisy that has been coming over the years not from the Palestinian side but from the Jewish side.

Another example on how the Jews fabricate a fantasy that suits the moment by plucking ingredients from thin air and presenting the package as reality is given by none other than Benjamin Netanyahu. The NRO editors quote him as saying: “Anyone who moves to establish a Palestinian state is just giving territory away to radical Islamic attacks against Israel. That's the actual reality that has come about in recent years.”

Thus, Netanyahu's fictitious opinion to the effect that to realize the idea of two-states living side by side in peace will lead to radical Islamic attacks against Israel, is made to sound like a proven historical fact. And this, my friend, is how these people shred reality, create fictitious “facts” and mutilate history. Furthermore, to make sure that the Netanyahu fiction is cemented as fact inside the heads of readers, the editors of NRO buttress it and nail it down as follows: “This is an acknowledgment of reality, not reckless rhetoric.”

Now conscious that Netanyahu goofed not once but twice when he added what the editors call an ill-advised expression concerning high Arab turnout at the polls, they try to justify what he said by putting out the fiction that his expression was but “a shadow of the contempt that Palestinians regularly show for Israel.” Here too, they offer no proof, no evidence, no corroboration and no authentication. They simply state.

They go on to pile ever more unsubstantiated attacks on the Palestinians, and then turn against Barack Obama, their own President. They say, in this regard, that for some reason, the President of the United States is blowing this controversy out of proportion as he did with a previous controversy, because he does not understand the need to defend Israel on the world stage.

Finally, they see the need to diffuse the situation and so, they suggest under the guise of speculating, that Israel should offer “concessions on settlement construction.” They also warn Obama that “this episode will do real damage to Israel's trust in the United States” instead of reminding Netanyahu that he is the beneficiary of America's largess, and warning him not to abuse America's trust.

They end by doing the very Jewish thing of insulting those they chose to hate for the day: The Palestinians who will be emboldened by Obama's stance, they say. And Obama who will negotiate giveaways to Iran.